Radio-Free America

The Universe as We Have NEVER Seen It

2011-01-26T08:45:00.001-08:00

Can you see the universe as not being in a container? Nothing contains it. There is no "box." The universe has no "wall," no seam, no bottom, no top, no sides. There is no "end-to-end." There is no such thing as a beginning and an end.

Although the earth is hardly a speck, truly even the largest galaxie, or a system of galaxies, is hardly a speck in a universe that has no end. There is nothing so large it can "crowd." There is no crowding in the universe. Everything fits in because there is no such thing as "no room."

The earth being so small and the galaxies being so large...has no consequence in the universe that is endless.

The idea of a "parallel universe" is because we think there must be something else. The universe must end. So what else is there after the "border" of the universe? There is no "border," no sides, no end. That wipes out any idea of a parallel universe. It isn't that there's no room; it can't exist. The universe is endless. It is just endless. "Parallel" is just our weakness of not understanding "endless."

Still mindboggling, is the amazing "element" of "unique." All of the elements which we know of are unique. They are the same and unchanging in the endless universe. Everywhere in the universe, oxygen or helium is the same. The elements never change. Oxygen is not something else a billion light years from here on earth.

So, we have "unique." Each element is its own fingerprint, and even its own blueprint. It has its own structure and its own discipline of "being." Oxygen is not alive, it just is. How can something inert, without life, "be?" That is absolutely fascinating.

More fascinating are all of the elements, and those which are yet undiscovered. They are not life...not at all, yet they "are." The elements can't evolve to "life," yet, they "are." Everything you see is made up of the single, unique, elements. The stars that you see, any galaxies you see, are made up of these same, unchanging, unique, elements. They have absolutely no life, yet they exist: they "are." This is a "unique" wonder in itself.

Juan Williams Greater Fortune

2010-10-22T11:11:00.000-07:00

I think what happened with Juan Williams is but a microcosm of what is going on in Obama's Administration, CNN, MSNBC, and all the rest of the uber-left-leaning, bigoted, intellectual "no-show" journalist wanna-be's who fire people over... "credibility." It is a fact that they also lost Glenn Beck (true), Geraldo (I can't figure why...he's ALWAYS left...but he would appear on Fox), Stossel, the liberal ladies who contribute on Fox, and probably a few others. The reason the left doesn't want Alan Colmes is because he simply isn't bright...but then neither is Rachel Maddow (dear God, No!) or Alec Baldwin (did you hear him on "Air America?" His mommy called in because he had a “no show” in callers. No one would call in!). Listen...Juan Williams isn't going back to NPR. He knows that Republicans believe in freedom of expression and he has a friend in us. He knows he can trust us. He knows what we really stand for. He even told Bill O’Reilly that he realized that O’Reilly is a “stand-up guy.” When you really believe in the Constitution, it shows. When you are a pathetic Socialist/Communist, and you still call yourself a journalist, it shows (you are a bigot, you are intolerant, you fire people for using and sharing common sense, and you want to indict Bush et al for responding to the attack on 9/11). People like Diane Rehm... who had guest after guest on her show calling for the heads of Bush's Administration...but never ONCE (ever) challenging terrorists, or al Jazeera; their wonderful methods of cutting peoples' heads off on their TV. People feel sorry for Ms. Rehm because of her voice. But she is intolerant as hell. I listen all day long to NPR just for the (free) education on the "left" they offer. To me...NPR IS the KKK of radio against Republicans, tea partiers, Conservatives, NRA, Christians...name it! I've heard Diane "go off" on tea partiers. Diane, because of people like YOU...Juan Williams now feels...black.

2010-07-25T09:40:00.000-07:00

I know you have seen and heard it all before about gays being ordained (anywhere). The Catholic Church and the Lutherans are rife with homosexuals. See just below from 1st Corinthians:

This is from the KJV (These lifestyle sins are the same in the Catholic bible). (9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, (10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

I counted, at most, 4 out of 10 lifestyle sins that have to do with homosexuality and pedophilia. Any (continued) sex act with any person does not qualify as living the priestly vow of "chastity."

You either read and heed, or you don't. I guess I don't understand... a church VOTING as Lutherans do...when it comes to obeying even explicitly stated scriptures. How do you vote OUT scripture? You have chosen to have a smaller bible, with no sin attached to your behavior...and parade around as a church. You really don't care what Paul wrote (or whoever you think wrote Corinthians).

I see what the Catholic Church has done to itself. Personally, I believe the Catholic Church parish is nothing more than a "farm," a "front" for hiding homosexuals and pedophiles, and for permitting them to do whatever they want to do. Easy pickin's. To me, the Church (and I capitalize "church" lightly), lost the Holy Spirit a long time ago, especially since they move pedophiles around to protect them. They don't protect the kids because that isn't what the Church is all about. The real Catholic Church IS pedophile and homosexual...from the top down (there are some good guys). Parishioners don't know. They are too brainwashed to know that they are just "fodder" for any priest or brother with an... "inclination." Reminds me of the original movie or TV series years ago, "V." You know...after we humans had translated their "Operations Manual," it was found out..."It's a cookbook!" "It's a cookbook!" was parodied in the movie, "Madagascar."

I was a Catholic, and very lucky to NOT be..."bothered." I later accepted Jesus as my Savior at 22...from a Baptist of all things! Catholics don't have those kinds of altar calls. Priests I knew at that time didn't know what I was talking about. That said a lot. They weren't saved if they didn't know Jesus (remember what Jesus told Nicodemus. He wasn't saved just because he was...Nicodemus). You have to be born-again...and 1st Corinthians applies...as do others.

Even for Lutherans...if you can allow for homosexual partners to be ordained as priests...and you (heh) bless them...and if the Catholic Church allows for the pairing of "priest" homosexuals, and for pedophiles to have "open season" on kids...then I can have an affair with another woman with (heh) your blessing too. Who needs scripture...or the Lord...when I have YOUR okay...right?!

So, I guess being a Catholic...or a Lutheran...is the correct Church after all. Who knows what else I'll be allowed to do? Fun! It's just that all that talk about the elements becoming the Body and Blood of Jesus is just talk. It doesn't matter if it's called "transubstantiation," or "consubstantiation," or whatever "substantiation." The Holy Spirit "has left the building!" He's not putting up with all this. The Holy Spirit doesn't care about Apostolic succession. Holy Orders actually originated and presently originates from Him anyway. The Lord giveth...and the Lord taketh away! Priests have no Holy Orders. Lifestyle sinners aren't seeing the Kingdom of God anyway.

It's amazing for me to be considered a heretic by any church because I believe in what Corinthians says. I guess the bible...is a heretic also...as compared to what Catholics and Lutherans...practice. Poor Paul...what a heretic. I'll tell ya, you just can't trust the bible anymore. I guess this is one more reason why "sola scriptura" is wrong. You have to trust your "Church," and your..."priests," not scripture. After all, scripture is now considered "homophobic."

Personally, I am for tradition...real Apostolic tradition. I understand only Paul was unmarried. The Catholic Church decided to do only what Paul said to do in scripture and not see the "whole." See? Give a homosexual an inch...and he creates a whole false tradition for himself at the parishoner's expense. Homosexuals and pedophiles have reigned free for centuries now since priests were..."celebate." Sorry, there is no defense for the continued practice of the unmarried priest.

Jesus CHOSE married priests. What, you're going to call Jesus "homophobic?" Jesus had no fear of homosexuals. Jesus is God. He is not afraid of anyone. He took on the devil and secured your salvation with no problem...well, He only had to die for you.

All the rest of the apostles were married. Jesus had no problem with that. They were married about a thousand years before priests adopted...heh...celebacy. He personally chose them. There is even more tradition...the priests of the Jews were allowed to marry for all their centuries. Therefore, trust what Jesus did...not what the church falsely calls "tradition."

Letter to Patrick Kennedy

2010-03-13T14:38:00.000-08:00

I hope you aides let Patrick read this. We'll see.

If you would permit me...I heard and saw your ranting and ravings on Fox News and other media. You were ranting about the coverage Massa received and you were angry over the lack of coverage our soldiers were receiving for their fighting at war.

Now permit me...I am almost 62 years old. I am not an idiot. I am not slow. Actually, I am well known to be a genius. No one does math or other things like I do. I am also a former Marine, former teacher, former cop, et cetera.

YOU have never served a day of service in the military in your life...like Obama. You have NEVER been an advocate of our service men. Your hypocritical rant and rave was ridiculously offensive to me, because you never, ever have been on the side of our troops.

Of course, you are a progressive. You are offended by what you have mistaken for Capitalism (instead of Imperialism). You align yourself with "great" thinkers like Marx, Engels, and their ilk...while failing to understand that they have nothing on our founding fathers. Marx and Engels never "ran" anything. They never were mayors, councilmen, governors...nope.

Now, look at the leadership of George Washington (President), Thomas Jefferson (President), John Adams (President), and all the signers of our original documents. What THESE people wrote...they lived. They were not...just intellectuals. I think the Constitution of the United States is far above anything your Socialist Obama believes in, or anything van Jones or Bill Ayres believes in, or that your sycophantic news media believes in. Now, don’t give me Mao...or Stalin, or Hitler. They murdered millions of their own people. Is that what you guys want to do? Some heroes.

I believe even James Monroe and the other writers of the Federalist Papers were far ahead of the likes of Marx and Engels. Now we have people like you...who never put up your lives for your country (as your forefathers did), and you simply do not understand the differences between simple global capitalism (exporting and importing only goods)...and global socialism (which is exporting whole corporations and sending OUR jobs overseas). Capitalism did not fail. Your socialism failed, "sir." How do you create jobs by exporting... those jobs. Subtraction isn't "addition." You CAN’T create jobs that way.

I can't believe that your family is so extreme left that you ARE out of touch entirely, not even so much with us presently, but you are completely out of touch with your forefathers who set up this nation. I saw your eulogy to your father. You claim to know our beginnings, but what you are doing is not capitalism and free enterprise...it is socialism and the redistribution of (my) wealth. How dare you.

You are NOT a patriot because you are backing the REPLACEMENT of our nation...by socialists and communists like Obama. I keep hearing the Democratic Party's financiers tell me that they want a RETURN on their investment. Wow! I saw the video. You Democrats have sold us...you have sold this nation to "others." You therefore believe in the height of corruption and treason.

I didn't know that my family was for sale, Patrick...because indeed, this is what you democrats have done.

Give ME a microphone on your floor. I will calmly let it be known what this country...what YOU should be about.

You are NOT about the Constitution that I know dearly. How do I know that? You think Tea Partiers suck. No, we are about the ORIGINAL tea party in Boston Harbor. No taxation without representation. AND you are changing us from a Republic to a Socialist nation: from free enterprise to state owned (Chavez). What, did you read his book too?

That you democrats are working to socialize this country proves you are NOT patriots of our Constitution and our Sovereignty. You and the rest of your comrades (Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Jed Brandt (the bald communist), van Jones, Rev. Wright, and most all of the news media...should be arrested for treason.

This will be twittered, and go on my blog, and sent to Malkin, Glenn Beck, Rush...

Socialism and communism is NOT change we can believe in...again, Marx and Engels never ran anything. YOU are too easily duped. It is obvious you democrats don't know how to run anything.

Hey, a post-script if you don't mind...your changing our country to a socialist-communist nation is worse than 9/11. On 9/11, we only got attacked. With Obama's election and your sycophantic betrayal, we are being taken over and replaced. Your family has now come full circle...your grand-father, Joe, was in organized crime...and now you present Kennedys are in organized treason against the Constitution of the United States.

My Country

2009-12-11T13:45:00.000-08:00

I support General McCrystal and our other generals. McCrystal asked for 40,000 troops quite early in the year. He was stonewalled by 'Private' Obama for months, which rather degraded our armed forces in the eyes of the world.

Then, the 'Private' finally decides he wants to send only 33,000 troops to Afghanistan...not 40,000.

This was another 'slight' to our troops and our generals, again, after months of waiting. The 'Private' did all he could do to discredit Karzai, calling him and the people of Afghanistan 'corrupt.'

The 'Private' said that this 'corruption' was why he could not see committing any more troops to Afghanistan. The Bush administration knew all along that Karzai was corrupt but worked with him anyway. The 'Private' acted like this 'knowledge' of corruption was new, and that he alone had found this out. Now, after calling Karzai 'corrupt' for months, and calling the people of Afghanistan 'corrupt' for months, he now expects their cooperation. Hmmm.

'Private' Obama and 'Cadet' Emanuel haven't got a clue to what they are doing. Even with the help of the phenomenal generals and admirals of our armed forces, they still don't have a clue. 'Private' Obama and 'Cadet' Emanuel have no learning curve in this area. They 'disassociate' (that's humor) when they hear the word 'war,' or 'fight.' These two are a very unique collection of corrupt politicos whose mission it is to bring 'liberation theology' to this country. Liberation theology is otherwise known as 'Socialism.' Socialism only breaks countries, undermining and emasculating our rich Constitution.

The unique thing about the United States is that we have the single greatest middle-class in the history of civilization, with the single greatest buying power in the history of civilization, and the 'Private' and his 'Cadet' are going to drain us (tax us) for everything we are worth. How long will it take the 'Private' and his 'liberation theology' thugs to cripple this country?

I DON'T support this President because he IS a dangerous, full-time Socialist, with no real regard that we were attacked on 9/11. But then, he is also a Muslim, as I personally have witnessed him say. Everyone else could have seen and heard him say the same thing, but you have to want to listen.

In all, he is out to emasculate the troops by his 'agreement' with fellow Muslims around the world, and he IS out to really CHANGE this country, because he said on TV that this country IS 'fundamentally flawed.' Goodbye, Constitution. He meant that our CONSTITUTION is fundamentally flawed. He started by belittling 'enemy combatant' status, and giving them our same civil rights, something unheard of in our history. You recall Senator Lyndsey Graham embarrassing Attorney General Eric Holder with that fact.

At any rate, think what you want. I am a former Marine. I think the armed forces should band together over there and commandeer any transportation they can find and come home on their own... as a show of 'no confidence' in 'Private' Obama. At our base, our families and our country are all we have. I especially want to keep our country.

2009-11-25T14:09:00.001-08:00

No wisdom is deeper than a relationship with God.

The Catholic Church calls it communion. The 'host' is consecrated and transsubstantiated into the body and blood of Jesus. We eat the host to have life within us. That is communion.

The real truth of communion is more in line with what Jesus told Nicodemus in their private session. You have to be born-again. Jesus said that. When you receive Jesus as Savior, and ask him into your life, you eat of his flesh and drink of his blood. Jesus was referring to what the priest does with the sacrificed lamb. He is the final sacrifice, the final lamb offering.

We can't physically eat Jesus' body, and we can't physically drink Jesus' blood. The action of our faith in obedience to receiving Jesus as our Savior ... IS the consummation of the Lord on our part.

The part that Jesus plays is HIS act of coming into our lives in such a way that we can actually feel him, and our knowledge of him is changed. We somehow KNOW He is Lord now. We consume Him by our faith, and He comes into our life ... communion. You need the ritual to do the faith act of consummation. The 'trans-substantiation' isn't in the wafer or the wine or grape juice; it is in your own body.

As I trust (even a small amount of trust) God, and receive Jesus by faith inside my life, I am born-again. It is HE who lives in me ... He is not in the wafer. The liturgy is of our body. We act out life. We are the ones who are 'trans-substantiated" (we are made a new creature in Christ). No wisdom is deeper than a relationship with Jesus. I become a temple to the Lord as I accept HIS original sacrifice IN ME. He suffered, rose and died to be in me (and you).

The lamb, at one time, died for sin. The lamb was a sign of atonement. But there was no resurrection of this lamb. There could be no transformation for the "masses." The lamb was only an impersonal, vicarious sign of forgiveness, because only the priest took part in the actual lamb ritual. There was no "life" consummation other than by the priest. An impersonal sign of forgiveness was never enough. The Lord knew that. The Lord knew that He had to truly tend to each one of us. God Himself had to come in the flesh to (yes) die for us - not die time and time again (over and over). He couldn't. So, He died once, but under the faith stipulation of consummation.

We eat his body and drink his blood as once the high priest did with the lamb, but with faith. We eat Him by faith. How does He get us to eat Him as the priest ate the lamb sacrifice? By making us all priests and altars at the same time. He became a lamb but he did not walk on 'all fours.' We became priests and altars, but we aren't Levites and we aren't made of wood (the altar). We became priests by accepting him into our lives (consuming Him by faith), being born-again; we become altars by permitting Him to die for us 'right there,' presently in our lives, on the 'table' of our body, our own life.

We eat in a new way, as did the disciples and the Samaritan woman at the well. The disciples were not cannibles. They didn't start eating His actual body, not even at the last supper. When Jesus said, "If you don't eat of my body and drink of my blood, you can have no part of me," he obviously wasn't referring to His physical body. Nor did the disciples start cutting Him up and eating Him alive. Rather, our FAITH becomes a powerful consuming act. We eat His flesh and drink His blood by our consuming act of FAITH. Our faith is THAT great and powerful. Our faith eats His life. Our faith is created in His image and likeness. He then lives in us because of our faith.

THAT ... is born-again communion!

2009-11-10T11:09:00.001-08:00

This email went to NPR. I know it's a waste of time. But I keep humoring myself. This was actually a tweet I made. I had to break it up, of course, and I copied and pasted each 'break' into tweets. I sent this whole thing to NPR. They need the education. After all, NPR is my free school on the 'left.' This is my way of 'giving back.' AND this WILL BE on my website:
www.radio-freeamerica.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------
It just occurred to me that one of the advantages the Muslims have over Americans, and any other country, is ... a license to kill ... sort of like ... James Bond ... a very ROMANTIC figure ... and he has ... a license to kill!

... Muslims see ANY of their killers, including the suicide bombing in Pakistan today, as "romantic," "heroic," but certainly not dumb ...

... no Imam discredits their killings, and all of these ... al "Wackis" ... approves these murders of ... kids ... women ... they don't care ...

... they have a "license to kill."

Imams KNOW they won't be prosecuted for inciting violence against ANY country ... due to the freedom of speech ... right? ... with a more 'PC' attitude the 'left' has forced on us ... like ... Major Hasan...

... they have a "license to preach" to those who are "licensed to kill" ... you!

... And you wonder why they do it?? ... Muslims enjoy it ... even those who would NEVER do it ... that's why they never condemn it ...

... You know ... your Muslim neighbor ... they condemn YOU ... you are an American ... and you are English ... and you are French, etc., ...

... But YOU are certainly NOT Muslims ... you are trash to them ... infidels ... and THEY have a license to kill ... YOU ...

... but YOU DO NOT HAVE a license to kill ... them ... YOU MUST BE politically correct ... "Not ALL Muslims are 'bad' ..."

... But which ones ...??

... The worst thing about not knowing 'which ones' is ... they ALL have a license to kill ... and EVERY country is now like ... a Vietnam ... a quagmire ...

Are you satisfied ... John Kerry? John Murtha? Nancy Pelosi? (Yeah! Like YOU really know how to win a war)? "Cadet" Rahm Emanuel? (Porky) Barney Frank? (Hey, Barney? You know what they would do to YOU, knowing YOUR 'persuasion?').

And because of the above names (and more), Muslims do not have to use politically correct speech ... whatsoever ...

Think about it...they have the freedom to prosecute THEIR war. We don't. Hmmm.

GOOOOD Taliban

2009-10-29T05:53:00.001-07:00

This was sent as an email to NPR, a very left-wing "news" organization, which continually fawns over Obama, his entire administration, and all democrats. To NPR, Obama can do no wrong.

The following parody is my take on 'Private' Obama's decision to NOT send surge troops in to Afghanistan in order to finally win this war. "Cadet" Rahm Emanuel is 'Private' Obama's Chief 'source' of 'intelligence' in this matter. The Generals have no clout. NOPE. They have been emasculated by... the "Cadet."

"GOOD Taliban...GOOOOD Taliban," says "Cadet" Rahm to 'Private' Obama, as he coaches his 'Private' to PET the Taliban terrorist. "See? He won't hurt you. GOOOOD Taliban...NICE Taliban."

"But what are all these metallic things strapped around his chest, Rahm?" Asks the naïve and child-like 'Private' Obama.

"Oh, uh...those are just bandoliers of special ammo they use against the remaining... 'nuisance troops'... from Bush," explains the "Cadet,"...
"It's okay."

The "Private" looks at the terrorist. "GOOD Taliban"... "Private" Obama says as he pets the... 'GOOD' Taliban terrorist, "GOOOOD Taliban."

2009-10-20T09:02:00.001-07:00

This email is part 2 of an email I sent to NPR yesterday. 'Talk of the Nation' was the venue. There were 2 veterans being interviewed for their "thoughts" on Afghanistan, and Iraq.

I had 'further' thoughts on the one veteran's idea of "exit strategy." This may also become a 'series' twitter. I'll tell ya, listening to NPR is the BEST school on the 'left,' and it's free!! Too bad I can't get a degree in this...whatever it is. But NPR causes me to think, and brings out my passion. Thanks.

Page 2: "Exit Strategy:" did you get a load of President Harry Truman's 'exit strategy' to end WWII? He dropped the atomic bomb! But... guess what?! His 'exit strategy' didn't work!! He had to come up with ANOTHER ...'exit strategy!!'

So, President Truman dropped ANOTHER atomic bomb!! What if that SECOND 'exit strategy' didn't work?!

Now - cut to today - that is why we don't have 'exit strategies!!' For one, we don't think of getting out... when we're getting in...we should send enough troops in to do the job right. When that eventually works, THEN we begin a process of pulling out, not before.

But you have to WIN first, then create an 'exit strategy.' You don't let things get in the way, such as failure, and culture. Their culture is why we are at war in the first place.

The atomic bomb is 'WHY' we don't have an 'exit strategy' anymore. If we can't solve 'it' by peaceful negotiations, or if we are (were - 9/11!) attacked, then we solve 'it' by overwhelming force (man-power!). It's called 'WAR.'

It seems that at least the SANE world has decided not to ever use nuclear force anymore...therefore...when you go to war (I covered 'war' earlier), you have to send in an overwhelming amount of force called... 'troops.'

You don't solve a 9/11 scenario with the 'limp-wrist' attitude of the Obama Administration. The Obama Administration needs to find another job...we'll help them in 2010...and especially... In 2012.

Yesterday, I wrote and twittered that the term 'exit strategy' was of the same humor and non-existence as baseball's 'bat stretcher.' There is no such thing. There is no such thing as an 'exit strategy.' It is a new political tool and strategy all it's own, invented by the Democratic Party, and was used as a political 'bully-pulpit' against President Bush. His Administration naively bought the idea, because they didn't realize there is no 'exit strategy' when you are beginning a war. You are not worried about getting out of the war when you are just getting in. Rumsfeld didn't realize he didn't have enough troops to effectively do the job, therefore the Bush Administration never got to plan how to get out. They eventually made the correction they needed to make, albeit too late, and acquired a very bad anti-war, anti-intelligent 'following.' The Bush mistake with Rumsfeld made the fictional 'exit strategy' really look good.

The Democrats knew that, but they weren't telling the 'rookie' Bush Administration. The Democrats really used this false pretense well. 'Exit strategy' was used as a catalyst to create more and more lies against Bush. After all, how could Bush be a good President when he didn't have an...'Exit Strategy'? Using the term, 'exit strategy,' made it look like each day the troops were there, that was one more day too long. "Oh!! The MORALITY...!!"

The press ate it up, simply because the media didn't know!! They had no idea there was no such thing as an 'exit stratgy.' Remember, the news media doesn't check much out. They didn't know it was like a 'bat stretcher,' but it sure sounded good...and it really made Bush look BAD!! It sold market share.

Mission accomplished!! But even Obama has no clue. He isn't going to send in more troops because he bought into what was only supposed to be a lame practical joke against Bush...the dreaded 'exit strategy!!' (You remember, the 'bat stretcher?) He doesn't have one!! He doesn't know he doesn't NEED one. This 'rookie' can't take a 'swing' because he can't find a ...'bat stretcher!!' I bet he's a Chicago Cubs fan...the 'curse' lives on...only now, American lives are at stake, not just a pennant. 'Private' Obama has put the Cubs' 'Curse' on the troops. They aren't going to win. But again, he doesn't like Bush.

"Obama's 'chickens' ...are coming HOME...to ROOST!!"

NPR does it again! They don't get it.

2009-10-19T21:05:00.000-07:00

NPR was having a 'discussion' about the analogy of Afghanistan to Vietnam, being a 'quagmire.' I think it's on 'Talk of the Nation.'

I can't believe what I'm hearing. The vets you have on have no real knowledge of history. They must have been trained by John Kerry, with a finishing school by Jane Fonda.

Back in the 'day,' Congress' indecision and politicizing the Vietnam war made it impossible for Congress to finish that war right. I'm speaking as a former Marine.

And please realize...that Kissinger only brokered a retreat for us...he did not end the Vietnam War peacefully. Remember, a retreat IS a military strategy. You can still attack a 'retreat' and maintain...'good form.' In the Gulf War, Saddam's Republican Guard went into full retreat from Kuwait. Our Air force and Navy detroyed them as they retreated...because a retreat IS still a military maneuver.

One of your guests talks about an 'exit strategy.' He says we never had an 'Exit Strategy' when we went into Afghanistan and Iraq. The exit strategy is a dead giveaway for a present-day democrat. That is a ploy of a democrat. It's a smart ploy. An analogy to the 'exit strategy' is a seasoned base-ball player telling a 'rookie' to get him a 'bat-stretcher.' There is no such THING as a bat-stretcher. There is no such THING as an 'exit strategy.' Most victimized presidents, like Bush, don't know that. That's why it was smart to bring up...'exit strategy.' It makes a president really look bad. Bush really thought he missed the memo on that one. He looked really stupid. But, Democrats...read on...

NO one EVER has an exit strategy when they go to war. There are too many variables. Show me FDR's exit strategy. Yeah, he had an exit strategy for fighting on three fronts (Germany, Italy, and Japan). "Exit strategy" is ONLY a political invention by a very jealous, present-day, Democrat party. We had no 'exit strategy' when we engaged our enemies in WW11, or WW1, or ANY wars the U.S. has ever engaged in. Can you imagine having an 'exit strategy' for ... the Revolutionary War? Hah!! Yeah, George Washington didn't get the memo on that one either...sort of like Bush. Right, Democrats? Oh. And by the way, Democrats, did you get the memo on the Vietnam War...that it was YOUR fault, YOUR quagmire. YOU started that one. A Republican had to end it for you...your quagmire. Oh. And you Democrats had ABSOLUTELY...no... "exit strategy." Oh. An "exit strategy" of epic proportions, DID start to form in 1968...at the Democratic National Convention...by the "Chicago Seven." I think it was a real riot.

Eventually seven defendants—Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John Froines, and Lee Weiner. They dropped Bobbie Seale. Your "exit strategy" started to "gel" in 1970 with the Kent State Massacre. Although Nixon was president then, this was your war, a Democrat war, started and "fanned" by whatever morality(?) you all thought you had.

You can't have an exit strategy when you first go to war, and you especially can't even DREAM of having an exit strategy from ANY war when it is mismanaged, second-guessed, your former Vice President SCREAMING tirades against Bush, and you continually charge your state-of-the-art troops with war crimes, and your CIA and other intelligence forces are continually investigated and threatened. Of course, NO ONE EVER INVESTIGATES THE TERRORISTS, or al Jazeera.

The enemy begins to see OUR... "exit strategy" when a timid, smooth-talking, 'child,' (in comparison to presidents before him), saunters onto the scene and talks only a good "game" of socialist 'appeasement,' not sound Capitalism and strength, and cavorts with known killer dictators (Chavez, et al).

YOUR 'exit strategy,' Democrats, is to so emasculate our troops, and so hog-tie them with charges, and making them actually read all captured enemy their (United States Bill of) rights (what rights?). They are now being read their (Obama) rights!!!

Congress has to make decisions. But this congress has absolutely no courage. We have nothing but a 'Private'-in-Chief in command of socialist wimps and political bigots, dumber than a "box o' rocks." He never served a day in his life. Those of them that have, I see why the United States is now in the condition we are in.

We do not have a war-time 'Privadent,' nor do we have a war-time democratic party. We only have a 'wimp-time' socialist party. No decision, lack-luster everything, and a 'Privadent' who continually misrepresents private business by stating that our TAX money has traditionally gone to pay for top executive bonuses...in the MILIONS!! It happens a couple of times in the bailouts, and Obama states that this is a regular business practice. Socialism is sooo weak compared to what this country was.

Back to our 'exit strategy.' What they aren't doing is listening to competent generals. They WILL listen to Rahm Emmanuel, and every anti-American BIGOT and goof (van Jones, et al.) who is against this country.

'Privadent' Obama is writing the book on 'quagmire,' bringing 'decision' to a new height of super-incompetence. Remember, not once did Obama EVER vote to support our troops when he was a Senator. Sorry, but voting ... "present...?" just doesn't ...'get it.'

I AM for pulling out (Oooh, surprise!)...but our troops should pull out by their own decision, commandeering any transportation they can get, and leaving on their own...immediately...as a show of NO CONFIDENCE for our 'Whatever-it-is-' in-Chief, 'Privadent' Obama. They can't arrest them all.

By staying 'in-country' there, without support from our president or congress, they have bulls-eyes painted in N-E-O-N on their backs. To Obama, the troops represent Bush's mistake in the middle-East. 'Privadent' Obama has vicariously left 'Bush' there to die.

Obama is VICARIOUSLY trying to kill Bush ...by not supporting the troops, or sending MORE troops. The Democrats are presently giving every excuse they can...but...they hate President Bush that much. So they hate and try to kill, vicariously, ANYONE who reminds them of Bush. That's why the troops are sort of...left there... stooges of the Democratic Party.

But 2010 is coming...and so is 2012...

Catholic Answers to Homosexuality and Pedophilia

2009-10-15T02:48:00.000-07:00

I listen in to 740 AM in Cincinnati. I don't remember the name of the radio show, but there are people who call in and one of you tries to answer. Of course, your show is not a discussion. You tell them what "is."

I take issue with a couple of things I have heard.

For one, I forget the term you used, but the closest thing I can come to it is "knowledgable." I am a "knowledgable" former Catholic, which makes me a "reprobate" Catholic. I was a strict Catholic for 35 years. I married in a Methodist church at the age of 35. I heard you speak to at least two Catholics, answering them about whether a protestant can be saved. You said "yes," as long as the person does not know the truth of the Catholic Church. You said if the person is knowledgable of the Catholic church, and that the person knows it is the only true way, and the person remains protestant, then that person will not be saved, even if that person accepted Jesus as his personal Savior.

I take GREAT issue with you, and also the Catholic Church. If you don't mind reading further, whether you think I am a "heretic" or not, please read. This is the only way I have of speaking with you. I am not angry (I am passionate about this), but I have some insights you have never heard before, plus my own personal story (I'll be brief, don't worry).

The Roman Catholic Church cannot any longer tell US its dogma and tenets when it breathes the sin and cult of homosexuality and pedophilia in "the Church." How can I say this? You better hang on to your seat; I am about to tell you the truth. Again, no anger, just the truth. Hear me out. I listen to you guys without saying a word (of course, you are on radio).

The Roman Catholic Church is NOT the same Church as the Church of Paul, or Peter, or Timothy, or even Jesus. Why do I say that?

I am not referring to the daily healings and miracles of that "day." I am referring to the years and years of "the Church" hiding the active "lifestyle" homosexuals AND pedophiles IN the Church.

For years, possibly generations, the Catholic Church has hidden the sin and debauchery of homosexuality and pedophilia. The Church has simply moved these many priests "around" to "hide" them, permitting these priests to go about their "duties."

As a child, I was an altar boy, and nothing at all ever happened. No priest or brother ever bothered me, nor did I ever sense I was in any danger.

Others have not been so lucky. I am slowly getting to "why" the Catholic Church can't tell me (or others) whether they are saved or not. You're not going to like it. But it's true. Just hang on.

Although I had no problems with any priest or brother, I consider myself lucky compared to the onslaught of actual charges of various types of pedophilia and rampant homosexuality in the Church. How often I would read the papers and see another priest charged with another sexual crime. There were true reports coming out about priests being constantly transferred because the priest could not "curb" his appetite. Hmm!

I would tell my wife that there had to be an "underground" of pedophilia and homosexuality right in the Church. Little did I know...

It finally dawned on me that the Church itself...was harboring, actually permitting... actually "blessing"... this behavior. I determined that the Holy Roman Catholic Church itself... IS... a cult of pedophilia and homosexuality! From the "top" down, the Church is involved in it.

At least one priest, Fr. Paul R. Shanley, was not only a pedophile, he was involved in NAMBLA! NAMBLA is the "North American Man-Boy Love Association," and he IS a chief founding "Father" (Pun intended). I have read his comments and his beliefs. I also can easily "read" the similar comments and beliefs of the Catholic Church, and how the Catholic Church permitted his behavior, even sharing. Let's not be naive about this and why his actions and lifestye was able to flourish. He was involved in trying to persuade lawmakers to change "age-of-consent" laws so he (and other pedophiles) could have sex with babies. I've read the NAMBLA web site. I began investigating it in 1999.

Very specifically, and as politically incorrect as I can get, I was disgusted. Because the Catholic Church had a "lifestyle" of hiding these priests, the Catholic Church approved of NAMBLA! You read right...the Catholic Church approved of NAMBLA by their very act of hiding these priests throughout the "network" of churches and schools throughout this country (and maybe the world). This is where the Catholic Church picks up the designation of "underground," or "cult." It became a "brotherhood" of pedophilia and homosexuality. And you can't guarantee "now."

This is where the church LOST its ability (by the direct intervention of the Holy Spirit!) to profer dogma, tenets, Ex Cathedra (God help us!!). I know what you're thinking! Do I mean the Pope is in on this? Do you know how many YEARS it took the Pope to say anything at all about this? You don't have a "SEAT" of Peter. If Jesus were here, he would whip at you guys like he did the money changers in the synagogue that day! That day was nothing compared to this. This is more like Sodom and Gomorrah, and you know why THEY were destroyed?!

Because of how long it took the Church to get a "handle" on "this," it is OBVIOUS that the whole Church is in on it. Underground (or above ground) the Church itself approved of all behaviors. I can't imagine what happened to the whistle-blowers of the Church. How were THEY disciplined years AGO, and years ON, for trying to get in the way of their... "fun."

I'm not done yet!! At one time, I wanted to go into the priesthood. There were a few guys I knew who decided (before I did) to go into the seminary. This was about 1974. They went to Duns Scotus (I think it is, or was, a Franciscan seminary). WITHIN THE YEAR they came back with stories of "initiation" rites. There would be a knock on your dorm-room door. You would open it and several seminarians would rush in on you and butt-rape you. They came home. They did not pursue the priesthood anymore. Homosexuality and pedophilia is institutional in and as, The Roman Catholic Church.

You can't tell me dogma and tenets, or if I am in sin or not. John wrote the Apocolypse. To one of the churches, he told them He would take away their lampstand (the Holy Spirit). Well, He took away yours. The Roman Catholic Church reminds Him of Sodom and Gommorah. But see, the Church is not a city. It is all over the world, mostly as parishes. How does God deal with a Church's "real estate?" He takes away your lampstand. Jesus does not show up anymore, not in sacraments, not in Holy Orders... because your sin is from the top down.

I can't imagine how many parishes have closed because of a lack of support (duh!). I gave a priest my opinion back in the '90's (before I knew about "this" problem, concerning "a" reason why the Catholic Church is having to close parishes or combining them. I advised it is (at that time) because of charismatic Catholics joining non-denominational churches. They needed to be "fed." Half of any non-denominational churchs' members are former Catholics. The Roman Catholic Church is losing its "faithful" to protestant churches. This is true. Of course, he said it was all demographics, that parishoners simply moved out. Yeah. They also "moved on."

If a man is listening to God, he is where the Holy Spirit is. We don't lead...He does.

I promised you my small testimony. You say people like me are not saved, even if I accept Jesus as my Savior. You say it is because I won't accept the truth (of the Church), when I fully know (supposedly) what the truth is, and that, although I know Jesus as my Savior, I do not know Him in the further truth and revelation of the Roman Catholic Church.

Before I was saved (and I was a Catholic in this period of my life), I was a United States Marine. A long story short, I was "toe-tagged," and my body put aside to go to the morgue so they could operate on the next Marine. I was pronounced dead. A Navy Commander, the anesthesiologist during my operation, later told me there was no way I should be alive (I obviously, "somehow," "came back"). At the time, I was paralysed and could only talk, and he asked me what I was now going to do with my life. I advised him I was going back home to work at a TV station. He was furious! He said he never saw anyone else survive what I went through. He said I was alive because I was "called" by God to be in the ministry. "Sir," I said, "I am a Catholic." The Commander said, "He saw you through this...He can see you through anything."

The Commander was prophetic. My life has been spared at least 5 times that I know of (He told me about one of them, concisely, in 7 words). I have also been healed of things as a Catholic, AND as a "reprobate Catholic." In January 2006, at 58 years old, and not a Catholic for YEARS, I received a phenomenal healing, akin to an arm or leg growing out. He talked to me again during that one. Oh, I'm saved, all right!

I told my wife about another thing. At the non-denominational church I go to, the pastors talk constantly about tithing. They even claim that you can't get healing or ANY favor from the Lord if you don't tithe. We had a visiting evangelist who said, rather arrogantly, that the pastor shouldn't even counsel anyone who DIDN'T tithe.

Do you realize that Jesus only gave. He never once said you must give tithes before you can come to Him for a healing. Anyone he healed, there was no charge. What He did was to obey His Father. His Father wasn't looking for money or gifts. He was looking for obedience (at least from Jesus). When He told Mary Magdalene, "Go and sin no more," you know she had no tithe to give Him. His words freed her, healed her of actual sin.

That is NOT what we see in the Roman Catholic Church. Secular man had to CATCH the Roman Catholic Church in the act. By "in the act," I mean that secular man (humanists, if you will) had to expose what was going on in the Church, NOT the Church disciplining ITSELF from the very start. The Catholic Church hasn't had a "Paul," or a "Peter," or a "Timothy" in the Church for centuries. It shows! Again, you don't have a lampstand, because you don't have the Holy Spirit.

We tithe only some, mostly because of extreme expenses we incur. Our mechanic gets 700 dollars' "tithe" at a time, sometimes twice a year.

But do you realize how many times the Lord has blessed me without tithing? My first-born daughter was an infant and had projectile vomiting. Nothing worked to treat her. She was hot and sick. I was home alone with her one night. I decided to pray for the next 3 hours before my wife got home from work. My wife got home. I told her that we were going in her bedroom and not coming out 'til she was healed. We walked in and started praying, casting out sickness. Within about 15 minutes we saw a little black "cloud" leaving her and going toward the bedroom window. It started back at my daughter. I yelled at it to leave, "... in the Name of Jesus!" It immediately turned back toward the window and left. My daughter was healed from that moment. Notice, from scripture, in the Book of Acts (the 7 sons of Sceva), that whatever it was... it knew the Name of Jesus, it knew Paul, and it knew OUR names! We weren't running...IT was! We were not Catholic. You can believe what you want, and you will (if you don't, you'll lose your job on the radio). I AM saved! And I have FULL knowledge of the Catholic Church. This couldn't have happened without our being saved. Go ahead, read about the seven sons of Sceva!

All of my kids are saved. And it shows. They are all virgins, and they all know the Lord. They are quite aware of the Catholic Church and other churches. They are "home-schooled" in politics, religion, cults, race, et cetera. We go to tea parties. They understand.

So now, who is reprobate? YOU cannot see the truth. The truth IS Jesus Christ. The Catholic Church is not greater than Jesus. Jesus even said of the man who was not of their "discipleship," but he spoke well of the name of Jesus, if he be not against us, he is for us. Listen, the truth is NOT inhiding sin. Paul said in one of his epistles (and I paraphrase), I hear among you that a son is sleeping with his mother. I don't recall the place in the New Testament. But, Paul advised STRONGLY, and immediately I might add, that the congregation shun them. The Catholic Church has not led in this discipline at all; rather, law suits have cropped up and brought the Church's involvement in pedophilia and homosexuality to the scrutiny of the whole world, and the secular world at that. Involvement means permitting, hiding, moving priests around so there are even MORE victims.

You don't have a lampstand. You ARE Sodom and Gommorah. When you go to church and look upon the exposed Host (in the Monstrance) on the altar (Jesus is supposed to be present), He is not there. The Roman Catholic Church has not repented. The Church must repent and be healed from the top down. This was caused by the "top." The "top" were in on it.

There has only been somewhat of a "compliance" to the secular world, but NOT repentance to God. And as we have all learned, a pedophile and a homosexual cannot be "rehabbed"... except by the absolute direct intervention of God. On that, I refer you to Dr. James Dobson of "Focus On The Family." "Focus On The Family" has had a guest or two who gave their testimony about being "exorcised" of a homosexual demon. These testimonies are true, and amazing. The Catholic Church needs to check this out.

A Letter To My Pastor

2009-10-05T02:57:00.000-07:00

Dear Pastor:
This is a very difficult letter for me to write. Writing this letter means putting everything I am on the line. I don't have that much to lose, but even that “much” means a lot to me.

I have been praying and listening to the Lord for some years. The Lord has given me great healing and wholeness during this time. Then, out of nowhere, I began hearing and sensing a major redirection from the Lord. This major redirection is not just for my family and me.

The Lord is telling me to say to pastors of all churches that He wants all pastors to repent of preaching and of their liturgy, and to start leading their congregations in worship. I am not talking about continual singing. The church's band, choir, or worship team is only to stand by as “background” while the pastor worships and leads the congregation in worship.

As I just mentioned above, churches are going to have to repent of their liturgy. This call to worship includes the Roman Catholic Church, and any other liturgical church, that they are going to have to repent of their liturgy. Can you imagine that? Liturgical churches do not include worship. They just think they do. God is tired of it.

Non-denominational churches ALSO have a form of liturgy. Again, God does not want liturgy anymore. He has shown me that a liturgy is a like a present-day “sacrifice.” He doesn’t want sacrifice. As He told Saul, He wants obedience.

There is a scripture, “Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” –Matt. 18:20. If you will permit me, I will paraphrase this scripture: “Where two or three (churches) are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” When churches are worshiping God in their service, they are agreeing with each other and are moving in the same direction. Pastors cannot give their opinions, cannot interpret scripture falsely (or by mistake), and worship removes any other obstacles. God will move.

Note: the problem at Barach Obama's church never would have happened if the pastor had been leading his church in worship instead of “preaching.” A host of other problems will be solved if pastors will simply obey (obedience over sacrifice) the Lord and hold their tongue.

Around 1992, I had an amazing dream. I remember it well, even today. The Lord has only slowly given me the interpretation, partly due to obstacles in my own growth.
I was in a theatre, standing on the left, in the back. There was no screen for a movie. This was a “performance” theatre, for plays. The light was on in the theatre and there were small groups of people scattered throughout the seats in the theatre. Comprising these groups, there were two or three people sitting together, even sitting behind each other in these groups. They were talking, and the great thing is that they were talking about the Lord, and about the things of God. This was not church, but people just talking in small groups of the things of God. No group of people was talking to any other group, just among their own group. It was like other groups didn't exist, no connection.

I saw a door in the wall all the way down the aisle, to the left of the stage and the great curtain hanging over the stage. I began walking down the left aisle. Going down the aisle, I passed up the small groups of people. I was impressed that they were at least talking about God. I got to the door and opened it and went in. I was immediately struck by the Holy Spirit.

I had opened the door to a great and beautiful hall, with many levels of oblong dance floors. The light was soft. Many people were on each level, slow-dancing in the same direction. They were slow-dancing to a song that all the people on every level of this great hall were singing.

The song was, “Jesus, Jesus, Jeee sus, there is something about that name. Kings and kingdoms shall all pass away, but there is something about that name.”

Then I heard a male voice coming from about the second floor of this beautiful hall, but the voice came from the middle of the hall, if you will. I couldn't see him but he was in the Holy Spirit. He said, “This couldn't get any better if Jesus Himself were here.” I remember basking in the Holy Spirit, but I sensed very strongly that I had to leave. I did not want to leave. Not by the voice I heard in the middle, but I was told to go back out there to tell the groups what I had just seen and for them to do it.

I did not want to leave but I was compelled to. I opened the door behind me to go back out and I woke up. I found myself exhausted. I had only been asleep for a couple of hours. I hadn’t gotten much sleep per night for a while, and I had been counting on this night of sleep. I felt a great urging to get up and worship the Lord as I had just seen in my dream. As tired as I was, I really wanted to get up.
My wife was asleep next to me, and I wanted so badly to wake her up. She had to get some of this. As all husbands and wives do, we have certain problems. It would bode poorly for me in the present and the future if I were to wake her up. I lay there for a few minutes, debating if I should wake her. You know: life, death. Also, as I said, I was very tired.

I finally got up without her, and went to the other side of the house to our large family room. I tried to make the light soft. I began to slow-dance, as if I had a partner, in the same direction as the people in my dream who were in the great hall. I began to sing softly, just as I had heard. “Jesus, Jesus, Jeee sus, there is something about that name. Kings and kingdoms shall all pass away, but there is something about that name.”

I sang as I danced for over three hours. Then suddenly, the Lord spoke to me. He said, “I have endured much because of you.” He then showed me a memory from years ago, before I was born-again. I was working the night shift at a Sohio gas station around 1970. One night another attendant took my place working the night shift and he was murdered that very night at the station.

The Lord showed me that this guy who took my place was a born-again Christian and he was ready to go. I was not ready to go. This guy had been made fun of by other station attendants because he would witness to them. I had never met this guy and he took my place and died for me.

I fell on my face, crying. I repented, but I did not know what to repent of. I had been born-again shortly after his murder. I felt miserable that someone had died for me because I wasn’t ready. This had been a decision of my sovereign Lord, and He wasn’t happy. He had to endure much because of me.

The dream interprets this way: I am standing on the left side of the theatre with the seating in full view. I am not on the right side of the theatre. I don’t know anyone in the theatre and I am not a member of any group in this theatre. In that, I am unknown. I have no reputation. I can’t claim any value to anyone. I have value only to the Lord. I am His. I walk down the left aisle and join no one, but I go to the door to the left of the stage and the great curtain, which is hanging above the stage. The door represents a calling, that I am needed. I am answering the call.
I walk in and I am completely in the Holy Spirit. When you are called by Him, you are in His presence. In this great hall, softly lit, I saw many floors of people, so pleasant to see. One church, though separated by geography or any other reason. No reason was more powerful than being one church, one body, moving in the same direction, obeying Him, worshiping Him.

There was no one preaching, no one talking. No one had center stage. All of the people were worshiping together as one body: many churches, but one voice.
When the male voice said, “This couldn’t get any better if Jesus Himself were here,” it meant the Jesus would have been right at home worshiping the Father with us. We don’t need to hear the voice of God to worship Him. It is His will to worship Him. We need to be united in worship to the Lord. The Lord Himself will then act.
I was compelled to leave and tell the churches what I saw. The groups of people in the lit theatre were the various Christian churches. The Lord showed me that they are not worshiping Him. They are only preaching and giving opinions. Each church has to worship god, not just talk about Him. No more preaching. No more “point 1, point 2 … point 7” during the service. We can’t TELL each other how much we love God. We have to love God by our obedience in worshiping God in the service.

The Lord is tired of preaching, and of everything else. He has seen it all, but we haven’t seen Him, we haven’t heard Him. He wants the worship. He doesn’t want one church here, one church there, preaching every Sunday. He wants each church to worship Him. Churches don’t even have to know each other. As they worship, they will be united in their worship (“Where two or three (churches) are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.”). Churches can’t be united by preaching. There are too many differences in the preaching. Only worshiping god will unite us, even if we don’t know each other. Churches will hear God, and be able to agree on what He leads.

There is an upside to a community of churches worshiping Him. Crime will go down. People in the community will be blessed, not realizing it is “you,” as churches worshiping and praying in their area. Worship changes everything.

How many people have thrown up their hands over the way any given community is going, or the way our country is going downhill. People don’t know what to do. A lot of people have given up. They come to church only for some solace.
We, as churches, are the answer, if we will lead the way by stopping the preaching. We have to worship God during the service. The power of God is going to fall on the streets of our communities, even throughout our nation. People will fall out (be slain in the spirit) right on the streets and receive Christ right there (remember how Paul got knocked off his horse).

The Lord wants us to unleash His power.

As in the parable of the Bridegroom, He is making a last call to all people, for those who will come to Him, even using churches that worship Him to make His last call. The Lord has shown me what will happen if a whole country, indeed, churches all over the world will stop preaching, and simply worship Him during the service. The world will change because the Lord will change them.

Specifically, the Lord has shown me that politics and the economy will change. As I mentioned before, crime will go down. Miracles are going to be regular occurrences. I have been praying especially for those with Downs’ Syndrome, and all forms of retardation, to be made whole. I am leaving nothing untouched. My God is big. There is also a “pall” over this nation; a dullness of mind and body. It is as though being dumb and stupid is “in.” We have all heard that our schools are being dumbed down, and that there is an apathy of purpose across this nation. We are a defeated people. This is going to change as whole churches begin to worship God in their service.

We will go to church one day, and the whole neighborhood will get healed because the pastor obeyed God and led the church in worship during every service. Attitudes are going to change, especially ours. Attitudes throughout neighborhoods of worshiping churches are going to change.

Remember the movie, “Field of Dreams?” The actor heard a voice saying, “If you build it, he will come?”

Well, if you listen, God is saying to all churches, “If you worship me, I will come.”
Pastors, I know you would rather have me talk to you in person, but I am shy. Besides, this is a lot to read to you after church. It’s a lot to talk about after church. By the way, I am not demanding anything. Responding to me is up to you. If you don’t want to respond, I would prefer a letter of no response. A letter of no response would better free me to start talking to other churches. Because I go to your church, I am trying to come to you first. If you don’t respond, I still will start to talk to other pastors anyway. Again, I am not making any demand. I am simply asking. I will still go to your church. Thanks.

mathphonics@yahoo.com

Muslim "men"

2009-10-04T18:59:00.000-07:00

The "oppressive" Christian God (Jesus), did not "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to murder absolutely innocent people (including children) by crashing two (2) fully loaded (meaning, with people) commercial jets into the World Trade Center. Their "unoppressive" Allah did.

Nor did the "oppressive" Christian God (Jesus), "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to murder absolutely innocent people by crashing a commercial jet into the Pentagon. Their "unoppressive" Allah did.

Nor did the "oppressive" Christian God "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to TRY to crash a commercial jet into either the White House or the Capitol Building. Their "unoppressive" Allah did. The "oppressive" Christians and some others aboard THAT flight were able to heroically avert THAT crash, and these "oppressive" Christians and some others made the "peace-loving" Muslims crash into the ground in Pennsylvania instead.

As a former "oppressive" Marine and a currently "oppressive" Christian, I couldn't have performed a more heroic deed than what those "oppressive" Christians did, and what others aboard that flight did, including the children (who were possibly "oppressive"), that were aboard.

If we were truly a Christian nation, we wouldn't be Socialists, we'd be Christians, laying hands on the sick, casting out demons, and feeding the poor (check out all of the "socialist" Christian organizations who feed the poor all over this world, which the world kings and governments WON’T do because of their greed, corruption, genocide, female circumcision, and a HOST of other atrocities that these "peace-loving" "unoppressive" Muslims inflict on people all over the world).

I don't think our "oppressive" and "socialist" Jesus teaches us to do that in our "oppressive" bible. By the way, contrary to what seems to be current popular opinion, Jesus never killed anybody. God did "sneak" it in with Sodom and Gomorrah, and you did watch the "Ten Commandments" (Cecil B. Demille)? Things like that.

Ahh! But notice! He did that Himself! If He wants to kill people, He's "man" enough to do it Himself. That may be your litmus test for what is of God...and what is not. Hmmmm? God doesn't tell us to kill people, except for what happened sometimes in the OLD Testament. Oh! I know...you think you got me! In the New Testament, Ananias and Sophira are struck down dead. But read the evidence. All Peter did was speak the words, and Ananias and Sophira were struck down. Peter didn't touch them. God did. Read it. It's in the Book of Acts. And they committed no crime against the "state."

By the way, just to note...the people of Sodom and Gommorah did not commit crimes against the "State" either. Their homosexual behavior was an offense to God. That's why he destroyed them. Read it. Oh! And the Pharo committed no crimes against the "State." The Pharo WAS the "State." He could do what he wanted. This was not a movie, but became one. He was an offense to God and God took care of him and Egypt. There's more. You gotta read it.

Now, look at more of what Muslims do. By the way...Allah can't "do", because "he's" just a concept. They don't believe in a "person" being God. You can be killed for that. Wow! They sure like to kill, don't they?

Now, remember: "unoppressive" Allah, not our "oppressive" Jesus, "tells" (causes) Muslim men and fathers to commit murder...and things like "honor killings" of their daughters. We had one in Cincinnati not too long ago.

Just recently, a newer, more IMPROVED version of an "unoppressive" young "unoppressive" Muslim terrorist drove a vehicle into a parking facility inside of a building and pressed the button thinking he was going to have his...seven virgins.

When he pressed the detonator button, he didn’t scream “… For Jesus!!” No. He screamed “…for Allah!!” The explosives the undercover agents gave the terrorist were not explosives. How "oppressive" of them! They were duds. So, these "oppressive" undercover agents saved lives with their "oppressive" "sting" operation.

I personally know that many agents are "oppressive" Christians. They "oppressively" save lives like that every day, possibly even your "unoppressive" life.

You know, wearing an "unoppressive" burka, or any of the "unoppressive" female Muslim dress-code items is a religious sign of subserviance to their "unoppressive" "men." Women are, basically, property, to their "unoppressive" "men." Remember, "unoppressive" Muslim men use their women and children as shields when they … "fight." I love such a masculine hero, don't you?

Thousands upon thousands are killers

2009-10-04T18:36:00.000-07:00

When you KNOW that Muslim colleges teach hate for Christians and Jews, and the “West” in general, how safe can you feel?

The Muslim ideology is the ONLY one I know where thousands and thousands, even millions of them, are killers.

Look at the African Muslim nations which are committing, and have committed, genocide throughout Africa. "Genocide" means they have murdered … and in the millions of people.

We are fighting two wars against Muslims. If we were not attacked, we wouldn't be there. Oh! And "coincidentally," we are fighting thousands and thousands of ... Muslims.

In Fallusia alone, we killed 1,000 Muslims. Did I say we are killing thousands and thousands of Muslims? That must mean that we are at war with a LOT of Muslims. Is that hate speech...or is saying we are at war with MUSLIMS... "politically incorrect?"

Or am I wrong? What ideology are they? I think...I really do...I think...they are Muslims. Where have I heard THAT ideology before?

Ah! I remember! Tripoli. Remember?..."From the Halls of Montezuma...to the shores of Tripoli...we will fight our countries battles on land, the air and sea..."

The Marine Corps Hymn! Tripoli...Thomas Jefferson went to Tripoli to ask why our ships were being pirated by...hmmm...Muslims! He was told that they will attack who they want...especially Christians! Us. They considered us...Christians (back then it was a "complement" to be called a Christian). We went to war...obviously. Or we wouldn't have the above in the Hymn.

What other ideology murdered us on 9/11, or who murdered us at the USS Cole, or who murdered nearly 300 Marines in their barracks, or who attempted to blow up the World Trade Center the FIRST time in 1993 (or '94)? They were Muslims. Hey, don't stop me...I'm on a roll...like John Belushi in "Animal House."

We're not fighting Hindus, or Lutherans, or Ba' Hai, or the Catholic Church. I don't think we're fighting the Jesuits, or even "The Fighting Irish" at the University of Notre Dame.

Wow! We're fighting Muslims. They keep attacking us and keep TRYING to attack us. This MUST mean they hate us. And they keep educating their young against us, both here and in their own countries. And even succeeding.

And how many Americans went to these local Muslim mosques and colleges, became Muslim converts, then went on to become terrorists themselves, against the United States? And some people think it's "okay" to breed their death to us in colleges ... HERE? So...it ...IS,... it IS...politically CORRECT ...for THEM to teach hate for the United States, and Christians, and Jews...here. It's legal. Now, where do you suppose they get to try out what they have ..."learned?" You better watch that building you walk into.

Can you imagine Muslim countries letting AMERICANS build colleges in THEIR countries to breed hatred and death against THEM?

When was the last time an American suicide-bomber walked into a heavily populated shopping place in Saudi Arabia, or Lebanon, or Syria, or Iran, or Mogadishu...and pressed the button to his detonator, screaming..."for JESUS!!!"

Oh! I know…you're asking...what am I trying to say? You're kidding...right...?

The cult of Homosexuality in the Catholic Church

2009-10-04T17:45:00.000-07:00

The Diane Rehm show had an interview related to church and homosexuals today on NPR. This is a response.

I see the homosexuality debate in "religion" the same as I see belief differences in Christian cults. What I mean by "cults" are the "Christian" religions that are an aberration of the mainstream Christian dogmas. Cults are not mainstream; neither is the homosexual "take" on Christianity.

From Sodom and Gomorrah, to Paul in the New testament, the bible is absolute against homosexuality (and of course other sins, like spouses going out on each other (adultery), and singles having illicit sex (fornication).

Jesus himself told Mary Magdalene to..."Go, and sin no more." She was an adulteress (adultery is sin). Even then, the rabbi's tried to trick Jesus with sin. People today try all the time to trick Christians with sin, and make fun of us, and now at this particular time, with homosexual sin.

Hollywood, various news networks (NPR), the GLA, even our wonderful educational system run by Planned Parenthood and their sycophant, the NEA, are trying hard to sexualize our children. Newer textbooks are even written which show no differences between a two-male parent household, a two-female parent household, or a male-female parent household (of course we all TOLD that the two females believe their household is better).

So, when my kids come home from school and tell us these things, we, [my wife (female) and I (male)] get out the bible and explain what is going on (yes, we are born-again). We let our kids know we were married in a church (similar to the wedding feast at Cana), that we are celibate to the world and exclusive for each other, that God really and truly is ONLY for heterosexual marriage (it says so in scripture). We show them the scriptures. We explain the incontestability of the scriptures, that our opinion really doesn't change what God says. God doesn't change with the times.

We tell them that it's good that God doesn't change with the times. Think what would happen if one "day" God got ticked at Christians and decided to say that his death on the cross is invalid, that he "takes it back" because we aren't worth it. Then we say, "But Jesus, look what's written in your word!" He then says (sarcastically), "So?"

And no, I do not espouse "once saved always saved."

His word is his word. It doesn't change...he doesn't change. You can always count on him. The benefits of "sola scriptura" are immense.

Without sola scriptura you can make any change you want to fit your "need." People miss the fact that Jesus died ACCORDING to scripture. He didn't change it to fit his need (and he had quite a need at the time, don't you think?) Shoot, if scripture was good enough for him to DIE for, wouldn't you think it's good enough for us to LIVE for?

Could I find a scripture or two that would conjure up the idea that I could have sex with whomever I like? Hey, look at what David did to get a girl. He had her husband killed. Remember what Jesus said to Mary..."Go and sin no more." He didn't say, "You should have been a little more discreet, duh!"

It is NOT true that "they" are just like us. Yeah, "they" go shopping just like "we" do, and "they" do other things just like "we" do. "They" study, drive cars, go to restaurants..., but that is not the real issue.

Male homosexuals put their penis in another man's (or boys') butt. That is the general act they are known for. What women homosexuals generally do is cunillingus. So, no, "they" are NOT just like "me," or my kids. And they can't have my kids.

Now, back to cults: the way homosexuals talk about God and scripture is cult. "They" think what they want, regardless of what the bible says. To them, the bible is wrong. As like other cults, a homosexual's Christianity is what THEY think it should be. They even say that Jesus and John were homosexuals..., and they quote, "The disciple that Jesus 'loved'...”

Christians do not accuse Jesus, or any disciple, of being homosexual. Well, maybe the Lutherans do. God (Jesus) is not homosexual. Like murder, this sin is not given a "pass."

The bible is not run by the news media or homosexuals. The bible wasn't written by homosexuals. The bible doesn't answer to "them." Jesus doesn't answer to "them." And even Jesus answered to scripture. That's how important scripture is. And when Jesus answered to it, it was basically just the Torah and the Talmud. Just that little bit was enough for him to answer to.

So, yes, there is a Christian homosexual cult because of how they "believe" and "live" Christianity.

As we have all learned over some years now, the Roman Catholic Church is a safe haven for this cult. The Catholic Church protects homosexuals and pedophiles because of its very nature. A Catholic priest, Rev. Paul R. Shanley, was one of the founding "fathers" (pun intended!) of NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association), and stated there was nothing wrong with having sex with boys. This was KNOWN by the Catholic Church, and this guy was well-hidden for quite a time and had quite a "time" in the Catholic Church. Boy! You want to talk about a "club" for men!

So, is the Roman Catholic Church ITSELF a type of cult for harboring both homosexuals and pedophiles.

Yes! Look at the lawsuits, the payouts, the closed schools and churches, and the merging of parishes as a result of the great monetary loss. Their "problem" is rampant. The years of this offense, the amount of participation, and the protection for the priests, even elaborate protection by "self-serving" priests, created the cult. Could it be that there IS no Catholic Church without homosexual and pedophilic participation (offenses) of the Church? The "opportunity," the offense, IS the Church! One day they will close down a seminary or two, because we will find out about their "initiation" ceremonies.

"Radio-Free America"

The Unification Theory of the Universe

2009-09-14T13:27:00.001-07:00

Can you multiply "origination?" By definition, origination equals "0." At origination, there is nothing. Any point after origination is creation. "Nothing" is significant, in that creation, by definition, is "next."

Quantifying "origination" is futile, because origination is a pretext for creation, or, what is "next." Origination can't multiply nothing with anything, because to multiply pre-supposes a "next."

There is no "next" in origination. No quantity can be "multiplied" by origination. If you can't quantify by origination, you can't multiply or divide by origination.

6/1 times 1/6 = 1

The above: because of quantification, or, what's "next" after origination.

0/1 times 1/0 =

The above: No quantification, due to origination. You can't pre-suppose context. There is only origination. There is no "next."

Infinity is a different dimension of quantification. You can't quantify infinity because there are no parameters. Origination and infinity are similar in that they are not quantifiable. They are not quantities, because there are no parameters.

Infinity SHOULD be quantifiable, but it has no parameters. Origination is not a quantity because it has no parameters. Neither origination nor infinity have parameters. Neither has a "wall."

Creation has force and is either quantifiable or not quantifiable. Which is it?

Creation "lives" within infinity and therefore finds the "walls" of infinity. If creation "finds" the walls of infinity, and infinity has no walls, then by definition, creation is not quantifiable.

By quantifiable, this means that one can't find the source of creation, can't find the "walls," therefore can't go beyond the "walls." You can measure "instances" in creation (infinity), but you can't quantify origination, the source of infinity and creation. I call this the "0" Effect. The "0" Effect means one cannot quantify the Creator, which IS origination.

In atheistic science terms, the "step" before the "big bang" is the creator.
-----------------------------------------------
The next paragraphs are what I wrote in response to a critique on my above writing. I also have a blog on www.thoughts.com

Actually, what I wrote PROVES God. And your 'Einstine' is spelled 'Einstein.' Hmmm?

The whole point of the the universe having no "walls" is that everything God makes is somehow made in his image. With the universe, it has no end. It had a beginning, but since it has no 'walls' (it is endless), its beginning is moot. It doesn't matter. You can't go to the end of the universe, or find a wall (a door, basically), and find God on the other side. God is trying to tell us, "Are you kidding? I'm right here with you, too. I am not 'bound' by the universe. But it IS pretty cool, huh?" The 'door' (the wall) is your heart. THAT can be opened. He is always knocking. Are you going to answer him by opening your door (heart)? Or can't you see the universe for the stars?

You can 'endlessly' deny him. Your 'heart' had a beginning. Will it also have no end? Your heart COULD end up with God IF you let him in. Or it could be endless...no walls...no door. So in this case, does the universe represents...you!

Racism

2009-08-07T11:21:00.000-07:00

I arrived at work early today, got a cup of coffee and went up to my post. As I got off the elevator, I noticed a small "line" (meaning they were sitting all over the hallway) of people waiting for Social Security to open. As I approached the closed and locked doors to the Social Security office, I could hear a voice that almost sounded muffled, like a TV was on. I looked in and observed a movie projector screen, and saw Social Security employees sitting in the lobby waiting area of the office. They were having a meeting, and were watching a pertinent video. I moved around the hallways to another entry door. The door was "coded." I input the code, went in and followed around to my desk in the lobby waiting area. I didn't disturb anyone.

The meeting ended and I opened the door. There were now more than 20 people waiting to come in for service. They had plenty of time to read signs saying, "Turn off all cell phones:" "No food or drink allowed in this office:" AND they were instructed by the officers downstairs to turn OFF their cell phones. Mentally, some people get picky and think, "do they mean "off" off, or can you have your phone on "silent" or "vibrate?" We have a very permissive society. Anything goes. We don't like to be told "no." Then, you have the complexity of cultural problems and attitudes. I have been told by black officers that white officers are given a hard time by black people on purpose. Part of the reason is to get "whitey" fired. The other part of the reason is to have fun, at our expense, while getting "whitey" fired. If you apply the building rules and policies and federal laws to blacks, their upbringing in "Black Liberation Theology," and Malcolm X "mentality" is to "introduce" their culture of bad attitude or non-violent resistence toward "whitey." To blacks, whitey is at fault for slavery in this world, and especially for slavery in the earlier times of the United States. More specifically, "I" (you) am held at fault for slavery in this country, as if slavery is still prevalent, and I own slaves. There are a lot of blacks who "believe" all whites are (presently) slave owners. There are blacks who still call white people by their first name, preceded by "mister." I am "Mister" Steve. That is specifically black culture. I have never heard a "white," nor any other ethnicity, call me "Mister" Steve.

Although the attitude of blacks who "do" that is pleasant, I consider it racist because of the "plantation "mode" of the black person using the term, "Mr." Steve. Contrary to their popular belief against us and my "inducing" a very specific reality check against their culture, I am not a slave owner. (And I did check) My ancestors held no slaves. To the contrary, my Sicilian ancestors could have been slaves themselves, either by the French occupation of Sicily (the root cause of the Mafia), or by any other country taking over Sicily. Sicily has never been an island country of its own. And by the way, there isn't a country in history which has NOT been a slave to another country. One way or another, we have all been slaves.

It is my contention that racism itself, in any form, and from anyone, is slavery. Black "attitudes" against unsuspecting whites today is a form of slavery. Blacks absolutely impose on whites all their anger for slavery that interrupted and interdicted their ancestors (but not them) for some centuries. You must absolutely understand the role blacks had in enslaving their "own." Black-on-black slavery and sales of slaves to whites and blacks alike made black slave merchants rich. Yet, blacks love their roots. Hmmm.

Under British rule, the colonies practiced the business of slavery. So, in the colonies, under British rule, and under British authority, there was slavery in the colonies. Slavery was an inclusive "thing." Slavery included white indentured servants. White indentured servants could be beaten or murdered. Don't let the term "servant" fool you. Slavery did include a number of peoples. Would-be indentured servants were already indentured to their owners before they came to the colonies. True, they did not come "enmasse" in slave-trade boats under the most heinous of conditions. The fact some of the slaves survived the "trip" at all would write a couple of books, which to read you would need a fair supply of barf bags. It would not be enjoyable reading. Have you ever seen the movie, "Amazing Grace?" You must see it. This movie shows how and why the English abolished their slave trade.

Back to my contention that racism itself, in any form, is slavery. Racism holds you to the lie and depravity of slavery, and seeks to put a person (intentionally) under the disability of being a "subject," and even worse, property. Slavery, and any anti-social attitude and behavior that has been birthed by it, must cease...in any form. Whoever employs the anti-social attitudes and behavior of slavery and racism must be stopped and re-educated. This includes blacks. Notice that blacks in Africa STILL practice the "business" of slavery.

The reason for all this discourse? A black man, who had been waiting outside the Social Security office with everyone else was now seated in the lobby. While he was sitting there waiting, his cell phone rang because, obviously, he never turned it "off" off. He was, now, talking on his cell phone "pretty as you please." I got up to slowly (you can't be menacing) walk to him to explain that his cell phone has to be powered "off" as if there is no battery in it. He knew I was coming, but he did not respond to me at all, did not even look at me, but took himself out of the lobby to the hallway outside of the lobby, where he was allowed to use his cell phone. As he came back in, I gently advised him to make sure his cell phone was off. VERY nastily, and, this time, looking at me dead in the eye, he responded, "I heard you the first time." I had never talked to him.

As officers, we are not allowed to be nasty, or even respond to such a very immature rebuke. The unmistakable presence of racism was kindled. I could feel his subjection of me. I am not allowed to respond to it in any professional way, or in a "comeback." I am only allowed to "let it ride," and accept his rebuke, as if I did something wrong in the performance of my job, or as a white man. I am not allowed to say anything in a nasty way. The client can say anything shy of calling names and cussing; but even then, a supervisor may "fold" and permit a client's degrading and racist remarks and let him stay.

The stress of hate is on ALL of us. Blacks have perfected a way of "responsibly" playing the race card and "performing" racism on whites through years of making us (the present-day innocent ones) feel guilty that "they" ARE slaves. "They" have enculturated the belief that they really are slaves. Maybe it is a way of "bonding" with ancestral slaves and the promise to "them" that "they" will make us "pay." "They" believe in absolute systemic (institutional) slavery, and YOU are part of the present-day scheme of slavery. (This paranoia reminds me of Star Wars, when Darth Vadar points menacingly at, and yells at Princess Leah, that "You are part of an illegal alliance...")

You are guilty. Blacks are brought up that way. Their reality, ultimately, is that you are a slave owner. You "owe" them because of "our" guise of institutional, systematic racism (slavery). You have a job because a black doesn't have that job. Forget that you have a LOUSY job, and that you are underemployed, and underpayed. You have a job! More thoroughly, it would seem most black Christians are just that! -Christians. Have you ever heard of Black Liberation Theology?

Look it up. Look it up under just those words..."black liberation theology." You will find one of the originators of black liberation theology was James Cone. In 1964, blacks were obviously not being afforded their Constitutional rights and privileges by some whites, both in some cities and some states.

At the same time, there was a man named Elijah Muhammad who developed the "black" Muslim ideology. I believe the Black Muslim "religion" is an ideology only, and not a religion. No religion should be teaching hate. You look at Louis Farrakahn and those who surround him when he "speaks," and you see people who look like they want to hurt you. When my pastor speaks, I don't feel threatened. Neither do blacks who go to our church. No one feels threatened. No one should EVER feel threatened by their pastor and any "goons" surrounding them.

One of the great "tenets" of the ideology of Black Muslim is that the white man was actually created by a black man who was a scientist (read, "The Autobiography of Malcolm X"). That means God never created a white man. "Somehow," the white man escaped the black scientist, and from "there" the white man "somehow" took over the world. I don't understand. How can one (1) white man take over the world. And where did I come from? Black Muslim theology doesn't discuss that black scientist ever creating a white woman. How did this white man procreate? And how long did it take this one white man to subject the world to himself? That must have been some white man!

Black Muslims differed from their Muslim counterparts(?) In that they believe that the white man was created by a black scientist in a chemical experiment, and was therefore not created by God. Blacks were created by God. As a matter of (their) fact, whites are considered evil and of the devil. The original man that God created was a black man. Adam and Eve were black (in their ideology).

Since the white man is not of God, we are therefore evil, then it is okay for us to be lied to. Remember, part of the Black Muslim ideology is that the newly created white man was truly an experiment gone wrong. Black Muslim ideology describes us as aggressive, very militaristic (robotic), toxic (argumentative), although very creative. We took over peoples and made them slaves. The white man invented slavery (much like Al Gore invented the internet). Again, one white man.

We now momentarily switch to Mr. Cone, and his new ideology of Black Liberation Theology. He claims that a white man cannot be "born again" just by faith in accepting Jesus Christ as Savior. The Blood of Christ is not enough. You have to set the "captives" free by giving to the poor and eradicating poverty. So, as you eradicate poverty by giving them your money (to Obama - remember, he was raised in black liberation theology), you earn your salvation. You cannot be given free salvation by faith in Christ alone. Christ, Himself, was actually wrong. Scripture is actually wrong. The white man created poverty by subjecting blacks and others to slavery, and a myriad of wrongs and atrocities. Eradicating poverty is therefore a white man's "penance." Eradicating poverty is not within the pervue or responsibility of the black man. We therefore owe black people not only reparations, but we owe the eradication of poverty. We created it, we have to fix it. That is Mr. Cone, 1964. We have to financially liberate blacks. Notice that Jesus Himself said that the poor will always be with us. We are in BIG trouble.

The combination of the ideologies of Mr. Cone and Elijah muhammad are the root cause of all blame for the world's ills being put on the white man by blacks.

They believe whites are inherently racist. We cannot help but be racist. Our race is out-of-control, mean, arrogant, a plague and infestation among the peoples of color all over the world. That we were created by a black man during a chemical experiment gone wrong should actually prevent us white men from any kind of salvation. We weren't created by God according to Black Muslim ideology. Therefore God has no responsiblity toward us in any area of salvation. God only has responsibility for the people of color he created. So, God can't save us. If anyone has responsibilty to us, it is the black man. The black man OWES us salvation. He created us. The creaTOR always owes the creaTED a means of atonement. God created man (except for the white man); Adam and Eve sinned against God, and God responded by providing Jesus, another black man, to save them. By accepting Jesus into their lives, they are cleansed by the blood of Christ and are made free by the Lord, and will receive eternal salvation when Christ comes again.

Ah! Just kidding! Black Muslims don't believe in the Christ, because, like Muslims, they believe in the "concept," Allah. Allah is not a person. Even saying that the white God is Jesus, is a death sentence for that person. This is why Muslims claim that if they kill a Christian...for any reason...it is good, because that person believes that Christ (the man Jesus) is God.

How does the black man provide us with salvation? I don't know. I have never heard that he has a plan. The black man has only been vindictive toward us, even some blacks adopting an ideology of hate and prejudice toward us, much like the sick ideology of any white supremacist group, like the KKK.

So, when a white (or even black) uniformed law enforcement officer yells, "Stop!" to a black person, the black person runs away and "drives" the fatal danger of any incident. When asked why the black man ran from the white police officer, the black person responds by saying, literally, "The devil made me do it!" But the black man made the white man, not the devil. "We" are therefore not even the devil's responsibility. We whites are an evil unto ourselves made by the black man.

The black man owes us, therefore, to repent to him. They have never figured out how...other than us giving them LOTS of money and turning Arizona over to the Black Muslims (Farrakahn's terms). Farrakahn stated that, for reparations, and just for starters, he wants the state of Arizona and for the United States to provide them with arms just like we provide Israel. When asked why he wanted the United States to arm his Nation of Islam just like we arm Israel, he stated (I paraphrase), "So we can go to war." When asked who he wanted to go to war with, Farrakahn didn't say a word. Like I said before, why surround yourself with people who look like they want to hurt you (goons).

This country (the thirteen colonies) was formed mostly by white europeans. The out-of-control devil white man, who was formed and created by the black man, is responsible for bringing blacks as slaves to this country (we now mix some truth with black fiction). How do black's break our "superiority?" How do blacks take over like they claim they once had (superiority)?

They started by trying to run away. They couldn't. They had no place to go. Some blacks did make their freedom by being accepted into Indian tribes. In the 1600's, most people in the world believed in slavery. They believed in real slavery. No black man had any rights because blacks were not considered human. They were considered animals. That is slavery at its worst because blacks had absolutely no recourse to their "condition."

But today, blacks still hold us accountable for the ideology of a people, and a time, that did not have human rights for all. Black individuals have fought just to be considered human. One of the credible points in their favor was the solution of a thinking process of people back then. Think about it. How many people back then believed that blacks were animals. Yet...and I AM going there...how many slave owners looked at a black woman, or a black girl, or a little black girl, and ravaged "it?"

Plainly, I'm speaking of rape. It happened. Can you imagine that white men thought they were having sex with animals? Part of what happened in this context is that white men were realizing that they were committing bestiality. Bestiality was an horrific crime back then, and I believe it was punishable by death. Well...

White men began to see the results of their rape. The black female bore a child (or, a white female bore a child). Hey! Wait a minute! Uh oh! How can a white man have sex with (ah! You guessed it) an animal and have a child? Stupid white men began to realize (albeit very s..l..o..w..l..y) that blacks may not be animals after all. Here's another "uh oh!" Some slave holders brought their slaves to church and "got them saved." The "Uh oh!" is how can animals be saved? They can't. Only people can be saved. You see where I am going with this? If only humans can be saved, and blacks are receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior...also, AND blacks can pro-create with us, then it looks like "blacks 'r us," don't it? Whites had to start accepting the evidence that blacks were human. They were people. You have to give people rights.

Many whites fought very strongly to promote blacks as people, and for blacks to be included in the Articles of Confederation, and later, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

It is unfortunate that freedom for blacks did not come about because of the above reasoning. I cannot imagine the great commaraderie slave owners could have had with their now freed slaves after discovering that their slaves were not only people, but that they were brothers and sisters in Christ. The above reasoning probably only kept white slave owners out of jail for committing bestiality. Realizing that blacks are people, and human, had no effect on the business of slavery...for a while.

I believe the overall reason for the problems we have today is the unforgiving attitude of blacks against us due to slavery. Too many excuses are cited against whites for there to be any peace. In a somewhat perfect world, all we can hope for is to have a much better get-a-long attitude where blacks do not see education in this country as just a racist "white" thing, that it is too "white" to get an education. If we could have a get-a-long attitude, we could easily deal with stragglers of peace because they would be exposed by their behavior. Those who just can't get-a-long we would know as racists. There would be no need for heavy security in predominantly black school. We could all tell the drug lords and gangs to kiss our butts.

We have to eradicate quotas by race in employment. We have to eradicate race on employment applications. We don't even need a census of how many blacks, whites, hispanics, etc. are in this country. Being truly colorblind is the answer. The census is being used as a political tool to engage membership, not just citizenship (democrats want illegals and felons to be able to vote. That is why democrats don't want standards in voting, like having proper i.d.).

Let's compete properly and fairly. As the black community forced equality in the latter half of the 20th century, so whites should force equality now in the 21st century. Ultimately, we don't need the inequality of racial bias put forth by blacks or whites. Equal education is an attitude. Blacks don't have the right attitude yet, especially when a number of schools in predominantly black areas are "encumbered" with the name, "Aiken High School 'University.'" The term 'University' actually refers to an underclass, underachieving "stats" the kids are in at that school. This type of school is predominantly in black areas. And have you seen their security?

I was told one day at one such school that blacks can't achieve. I was told this by a black teacher. There are predominantly black schools that actually hold court before the school is open for class (like Whittier in Cincinnati). Kids and parents alike are arrested...before class. Attitude. Parents aren't parenting kids. And have you seen the way many black girls treat their kids? Good Lord!!

I've been a substitute teacher at some of these schools. I thought..."You have got to be kidding me!!" I grew up in poverty, but this crap is beyond poverty. I say to Black Muslims, "Okay, now, who was made by man, and who was made by God?!" The black man created the white man, then the black man is the God of the white man. How can black men underachieve if they are God...God does not underachieve...how can black men be criminals if they are God...how can black men be addicted to drugs and alcohol if they are God...how can one black man even THINK of killing another black man if they are God...you want more?

Okay. Black men have already taken over their "areas" with their own "culture." You think that is worth emulating? If you are my God, I won't pray to a drug addict. If you are my God, I won't pray to a murderer. If you are my God, I won't pray to an alcoholic. If you are my God, I won't pray to a rapist. You want more?

Okay. Africans who come here to study and follow the American dream do not identify with you. I have heard them say, time after time, "they" don't know what they have here. "They" are missing it.

Blacks must take responsibility for themselves. That doesn't mean the way Black Muslims teach blacks...that is, to hate "whitey." No white person caused what I have seen. There are blacks who swear that the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) secretly got drugs pushed into poor communities, especially black communities, poor to upper class. I grew up in the projects, especially in my latter high school years. No one ever offered me drugs, black or white. And I was an easy "mark." Instead of hanging around with thugs and becoming one, I worked.

If you "skulk" around long enough in the wrong places you will find people doing drugs. People have offered me drugs since I have been an adult. But it was after work one night at someone's home, in a very nice area, the peer pressure was very intense. I said, "No." And lost "friends." There are choices you have to make. A black guy one day was "ripping" me because he thought I felt I was better than he was because I didn't do drugs. On the contrary, I told him, he thought he was better than me because he DID drugs. He made fun of me all the time, talking about me in the third person as if I wasn't there. He would harass me the whole shift. He even called me his "master," chiding me constantly. You know, real stupid high school stuff. I asked him if he wanted me to quit work. He said he wanted me to die. He further said if it were legal, he would kill me. And blacks say they can't be racists.

This kind of racism is what I went through in high school. Blacks would threaten me all day long, even hold me for their lead gang member. This was in the '60's. All day long one black guy would verbally "work" on me. I was short, skinny, and no threat to anyone - which is just what these cowards wanted. I said nothing to authorities because I was stupid. But during class (like chemistry) when a teacher could HEAR the threats made to me the whole class long, I felt that if the teacher wouldn't do anything about this, then no one could. I almost quit school. I went from motivated to quitting.

None of this caused me to do drugs, or actually quit school, or anything. This didn't even cause me to hate blacks. I was a nice guy. I just carried on.

What this kind of racism did for me was to raise my awareness, and really listen to what people were saying. When I heard people talk about racism, my ears perked. I listened very closely. I heard complaints about whites and my ears perked. I heard complaints about blacks and my ears perked. I listened to arguments.

Agendas can make complete fools of people. Al sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakahn, and others have maintained their ridiculous stance on what their take on racism is. Most of the time they cry "wolf." They do not understand the damage they do to their credibility by what they say. I am a living victim of how they abuse people. I am even more abused by the memories they stir up in me.

By their reasonings, I was the racist because I caused blacks to threaten and demean me all day long by my being silent, trying to go about my business, and not bothering anyone. By being white, I instilled in the black bullies to persecute me for being white, small, and quiet, and to waste their time on me by bullying me as if I was some rich slave owner, which I guess I was to them. In causing them to waste their time on me, I was taking them away from their "studies"..."sports"...or any other school "function," just because I was too good to pass up. The temptation I provided them was too great.

The faults I had were that I tried to pay attention in class - a strict "no-no" to blacks. That's when I really caught it. My God, I was so racist, I also took notes in class!! Or tried to. Gee, I might actually succeed in life and prevent a black man from getting a job because I actually knew the material. My test scores would be higher. I am such a racist. Many blacks' test scores are lower because they can't be bothered with what they consider is "whiteys'" education. Attitude. Many blacks are brought up this way. Life in the past...it's kind of an oxymoron to say you are raised (meaning "forward"), in the past (backward). You are your own prison.

In many black gang cultures, you are actually making their living for them. They are God - remember? When they rob you, they are taking only what's theirs. You are their "earner." What's yours is theirs. They just haven't gotten around to taking what's theirs from you yet. Because you have what's theirs, they can also kill you when they take what's theirs from you who have what's theirs. How dare you have what's theirs? That is tantamount to a death sentence for you. That is why they don't bat an eye when they murder you. They are just defending what is theirs. Your life is theirs because they are God. God giveth and he taketh away!

I am very glad that the "beliefs" and "theology" of the Nation of Islam are fiction. I do ask that Farrakahn let me invite his alien friend to lunch sometime. Give him a break from the confines of his space ship...and I have a ton of questions to ask him. I feel sorry for those raised in black liberation theology. Just watch Obama work. We, at on time, had a great country. Now, we are all to wear brown shirts like the Hitler youth, and give each other up for what we say. Bye...First Amendment.

The following is called "pork." Much like what politicians do when they add their pork, or earmarks, or unrelated "stuff," to a supposed pertinent bill to be signed into appropriations.

And when the fear is up and running over the H1N1 virus, Obama will have the military take over by martial law in our neighborhoods and confiscate all guns. Bye...Second Amendment. Although, notice...band camps all over the country (thousands of high schoolers and colleges), are meeting "en masse" for their marching band practice for their competitions they will have throughout their school year. No one has caught, or is catching, the swine flu (oh! I mean the H1N1 virus). Could the pandemic that Obama is talking about be a hoax? You only hear about one (1) dying here or there. Nothing en masse.

National Public Radio does it again on racism

2009-08-03T12:20:00.000-07:00

You guys did it again. You (NPR) just allowed a program to air which said that the Professor Gates arrest was on an EQUAL par to the hosings and beatings and lynchings of blacks in the 50's and '60's. It came at the end of the segment.

That program was just aired. No one was allowed to challenge it. The web site to the compelling and true story is: www.thestory.org

The story was about a black woman's travail and the abuse she did receive.
It was 1964. I believe Janet Babin hosted this segment. She or someone, at the END of the program, (and the program itself was excellent, a true documentary) stated flatly that (Prof.) Gates received the SAME treatment as blacks back then in the '60's. Un..be..liev..able.

I am against what happened to blacks years ago, and I can't believe we HAD slavery in this country or ANY, including the present-day slavery that is STILL going on in black countries (black-on-black slavery).

But I'll be damned if I am going to let you idiots get away with a program that says that what happened to Professor Gates was of the SAME racist and murderous bent and mentality of those past times.

You all need a checkup from the neck up. That is like saying that regardless of any present situation, or any outcome at all...it doesn't matter. You intimate that we whites now are the same as the whites back in slavery days. "We" haven't changed AT ALL.

You insulting boors.

With letting that program state that "crap," NPR has just created a new left. Congratulations.

I'm glad I do listen everyday. I wouldn't have missed this for the world. I need a transcript of this one.

Your moderator, I believe Janet Babin, actually SAID that the Gates arrest was of the SAME racial bent as years ago. Sgt. Crowley needs to hear this...so does the President, so does Fox News (Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, Limbaugh, et al).

So much for the beer. I guess Obama lied if he feels the same.

You see, America? This is what the left does! They inspire racism and MORE racism! (Just like they inspire socialism and MORE socialism, and treason and MORE treason).

You think the "Gates" situation is a done deal with the President and all, but you gotta stay tuned-in to the left. Don't be gullible and naïve. They will soon actually tell you what they are REALLY thinking.

Please note: National Public Radio is a great education on the left.

This HAS to go on my blog:

radio-freeamerica.blogspot.com

Done.

Come home!

2009-07-28T07:13:00.001-07:00

President Obama apologized to all Muslim nations for the actions of former President Bush, and the United States of America in general.

Because of Obama's apology, all American armed forces should simply come home on their own. Our armed forces should not stay in Afghanistan or Iraq another minute. The troops should talk among themselves, figure out how many troop transports they have available, take those home, and for those troops who can't get a military flight home, just figure out a commercial flight itinerary.

I would not stay another day in the mid-east since Obama has apologized for us. What are we there for? He has admitted that it is wrong we are there.

Besides, now he wants us to read "them" their rights when they are captured, as if they were here in the United States. Although these enemy combatants are living and fighting there, our armed forces have to treat them as though they live in the United States, were born in the United States, and are citizens o the United States, and they have simply "jay-walked." But why should we try to capture "them" there when we should not be there?

Come home! On your own. Do not wait for any deadline. Your deadline was the Obama apology for your "fault" at being there.

Of course, the terrorists do not have to apologize for Osama's 9/11, nor for any other atrocities they have committed against the United States, like beheading Pearl on al Jazeera TV for the world to see, or shooting Matt Maupin in the back of the head on al Jazeera TV for the world to see. It is "ok," according to President Obama, for the terrorists not to abide by the Geneva Convention, especially since we were at fault for 9/11, et cetera. In Obama, we have a President who recognizes our "fault" when he sees it. The United States has to abide Geneva Convention, now as a punishment rather than as a "civil" and non-barbaric agreement.

Terrorists are more protected and better treated than even our criminals here in the "states."

I am sure that Nancy Pelosi, John Murtha, Harry Reed, President Obama, Henry Waxman, Ted Kennedy, Dennis Kucinich, Al Gore, John Kerry, "Mrs. Sheehan," and a host of other democrats would love to see our armed forces take the initiative and come home on their own.

The democrats have railed at, and against Bush and the troops for years. Murtha was a Marine, but that has never stopped him from already convicting Marines for war atrocities, without trial, due process, or any "pleasantries." Murtha doesn't have pleasantries, just wild... and the dumbest accusations against our troops that are not even close to the great class and importance of the office he holds in congress. Pennsylvania is not some "dump" that he belongs to. He is a resident of the state where the Constitution was ratified. Murtha does not project that great class, not at all.

There is no reason to be "there," if Obama is going to continually undermine our troops by apologizing for them being there, and by insinuating by the apology that we, the United States, deserved what we "got" on 9/11.

If we deserved what we got on 9/11, what the heck are we doing there? And if we were at fault, as Obama and all the democrat "Jane Fondas" believe, then each "kill" we make is first degree murder, and John Murtha is right! String 'em all up!!

Men...come home to those of us who care...and welcome home. We'll further hide you from coming prosecution of war crimes and desertion, and we'll vote for YOU to get elected to congress and we'll get rid of the treasonous.

It is horrific to see that the "Jane Fondas" are in charge of this country, and not the "John Waynes."

Bail yourself out by buying American

2009-07-25T10:00:00.000-07:00

Economies around the world need to start rethinking Nationally (that they are Sovereign nations), and STOP thinking Globally (giving their corporations, and therefore their jobs, to other countries), because they ARE Sovereign).

That kind of Global economy has become the ruin of all government types, from the tyrannical no-world countries, to the third-world countries, to the powerful First-World Republics and Democracies. It is a free-market economy...Capitalism...that exports and imports goods; but giving away jobs Globally eventually interrupts and stops a free-market economy, which is true Capitalism. Capitalism and the free-market is based on the people of any society making it on their own, from the poor picking themselves up by their "bootstraps," to the filthy rich getting it handed down to them.

Trickle-down economics doesn't mean sitting down, doing nothing, and waiting for food to drop in your mouth. Free-market Capitalism means entrepreneurs who provide jobs (trickle-down) to those who will go out and get them. Entrepreneurs need you. Their goal is to grow and hire you.

The kind of Globalism that exports and imports corporations and jobs is not Capitalism. It is Socialism; and is based on spreading the wealth by moving jobs from the country of origin...to another country...just to find the promise of "economies-of-scale." But the grass isn't always greener on the other side. Globalism forces the country-of-origin to close their factories at home (the original host country) and lose jobs at home, just to open factories and recreate those same jobs for others in the other (parasitic) country.

Banks begin to tank at home, not only because of the sub-prime scandal and mismanagement by Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac, and because of the failure of a Barney Frank and a Chris Dodd, but because Globalism began to take away our leverage of diversity of funds and accounts in our banks.

How often it was said as I grew up that the U. S. could not EVER suffer another depression again because of the safeguards of diversity...meaning we didn't rely on only one or two industries to keep this country financially sound. We aren't like the Saudi's, in that if they lose their oil market, they will lose their wealth and become a third- or no-world country. Banks begin to tank (Globalism) because the other country becomes the new bank for the new business. The old bank loses the account...less money to invest. If the "Global" business fails, for whatever reason, the new (Globally created) bank ALSO fails and tanks (because they had no diversity anyway). There go the (Globally) promised jobs. There already went the old jobs and banks. But do you notice how our country keeps putting more and more businesses in China? We are creating their "diversity" for them. And we are killing our own. They own us.

Economy-of-scale is not all that it is cracked up to be. The cost-of-goods in the country-of-origin may not be the lowest it can be, but jobs that are there, and the support industries they support, are the stability of that economy. This is the real basis (diversity) for economies of scale.

Diversity...not losing it...in every sector...you don't lose your diversity to another country. No matter what Madeline Albright says, or even the United Nations...we can't fear (?) being well-off as a country. Instead of being jealous, other countries should try our way. You start "spreading the wealth" and you eventually cause tanking. You can spread the knowledge, but you can't spread the physical wealth (Globalism through tanking).

The real-estate market tanked because of sub-prime squandering, the stupid lending to less-than-desirable "clients." A bank's policy of lending is there for a reason. Policies protect the free-market system. ACORN submarined (torpedoed) it. Obama really did have a lot to do with that. He trained people on how to undermine not only a bank's policies, but Federal laws, and stooping to low-brow tactics like sending people to bank official's homes and intimidating them with charges of racism, and simply the fear of these people being at their homes. Sorry, but to me, these are KKK tactics. It is specifically targeted racism, meaning that this was a stunt designed to undermine and bypass the policies and laws of lending to those who would default. But, to Obama and ACORN, their racism is better than the free-enterprise system. Their racism helped bring about the redistribution of income, using the mortgage industry (housing) as the first strike.

The equal analogy to the sub-prime market (ACORN) is the global market (Madeline Albright et al) and thinking that a global, socialist economy would create great wealth (but for who?). All it did was redistribute wealth in such a way that the economies imploded. Nothing held up to standard because the standards were relaxed. When you have no standards, anything goes. In America, our free-market economies are endowed with a culture of support industries (from trickle-down economics) that have been built up over several generations (remember, we are a young country). Support industries rely on (trickle down) the long range stability of "control" industries...like the auto industry, the airplane industry, the textile industries, yes, even our monetary system (who we borrow from) etc. You start shipping those jobs overseas and constantly buying foreign, and you then shut down (tank) our now not so incredibly deep support industries.

The "control" industries are like giant trees which have their roots going deep into the earth, receiving vital nourishment (buying American), and providing the national stability of jobs in all the sectors that they influence, and that their roots have been long "established." You cut down these (or any country's) "control" industries, and you cut down their "everything" that relied on them. And we all know what happens when you cut down a whole forest...you create the means for a dust bowl and floods. There is nothing to hold the soil. There is great erosion and poverty of the soil. That translates to the loss of jobs and "tanking."

You must understand that in real life, support industries will close because of the close relationships they develop with their "control" industries. They can't find further demand fast enough to stay open. Remember, it's one of the tenets of good business to have an exclusive relationship with your support industries. The "control" industry goes, and so goes the support industry. Jobs everywhere are lost. Yes, jobs in other countries are created. New economies in other countries are formed at our expense. Since when did the United States become expendable? A question I have is why are we tanking our own country...on purpose?

We need to buy American; Germany needs to buy German; France needs to buy France, et cetera. We need to be a lot less global (socialistic), and become a lot more patriotic, each country. Everyone needs to be more patriotic to their own country and buy their own national goods. Obviously, they should buy from other countries what they can't buy in their own. Exporting and importing goods is Capitalism. Call this mentality "provincial," call it "parochial," call it naïve. You want your country back and indicators like the Dow Jones to go back up? Buy American. Buy American whether you like it or not. Buy American whether you think foreign cars are better or not. Every time you buy a foreign car, you basically give those foreigners easy money to buy American real estate. American real estate is a bargain to the Japanese and the Chinese. They are buying this country right from under your nose. Where do you think the stimulous money is coming from? Your government borrowed it from the Chinese government. Future taxes will have to pay it back. By "future," I mean our kids and their kids...

National Public Radio just ran a story (at this writing on 02/23/2009) about Chinese who come to the United States to buy $500,000 homes because their money is worth so much more against ours.. We, as Americans, do similar in Mexico. But we haven't bought "Mexican" like the Chinese are buying "American." The Chinese are buying a number of $500,000 type homes and other real estate, each...in cash! "American" factories in China are causing this. Other countries' factories in China are also causing this against their countries.

For so long, Americans over the long years have been ridiculed and besmirched for having some of their goods made in other countries because of the sweat shops. Well, the host countries' factories ARE sweat shops. They have little to no human rights codes or laws. American factories (and some other countries) have gone their full economies-of-scale...low costs, low prices, mass production on an unreal level.

In our country, we don't have sweat shops. We do have highly advanced union shops. Unions (especially the AFL-CIO) have made sure that American factories adhere to the highest human rights standards. American unions are the most advanced work force in the world. Unions, such as the AFL-CIO, single-handedly created our great middle-class, the greatest single buying unit in history. They have caused us in this country to enjoy life on a scale never before seen in history. If it's union made, it keeps jobs open and they are the ones "who keep the light on for you" in this country.

Here in America, unions have created a buying force unparalleled in human history. When you look at all the thousands and thousands employed in our country's auto industry, and then look at the thousands upon thousands employed in the auto support industries, then look at the union population of General Electric and the entire transportation industries, they generate (in geometrically expanding numbers) a buying public with needs, desires, and wants, with insatiable impulse buying power [sodas, chips, cigarettes, snuff, beer, pretzels, motorcycles (do you realize how many Harleys the U.S. auto industry workers buy? They buy American because they know better. And how many contract guards buy Harleys? And how many rich people buy Harleys? You can believe that Harleys, if not motorcycles in general, are an impulse buy). Cars, trucks, fishing gear, hunting gear, firearms, ammo, TV's, sports equipment and a whole lot more]. This is middle-class America with unheard of buying power. They are America, and they have earned it!

Partly because of the new middle-class created by the U.S. auto industry and its support industry, you have banks in record numbers approving credit. Talk about the truth of "trickle-down" economics; look at the credit industry that was spawned. You have tremendous "callcenters" for Sam's Club card holders, Federated call-centers for Macy's and other Federated stores, and other call-centers for credit traffic. These jobs and thousands of other jobs created (trickle up?) by our middle-class buying power, is nothing less than tremendous and only strategic for the United States if kept HERE by buying American (especially cars and trucks). I apologize for ever buying foreign. I will amend my ways.

When I go to the store to buy groceries, I go to a local store. I don't go to Mexico, or Canada, or France, or Germany to buy something. I buy here. I know that what I just wrote sounded stupid, but hear me out. Every time I go to the store, I admit that I can't go to a foreign country just to buy my regular groceries. That would be stupid and unbelievably expensive. It is nowhere near practical to grocery shop in Canada or Mexico, much less board a plane and grocery shop in France or Germany...then come right back! When you grocery shop in your neighborhood, you are actually buying from other countries. Your local store has already purchased his goods for you to buy. At this time, China has "most favored nation" status. Other than most of the groceries you buy, most of your other items are foreign-made. You can hardly "buy American" in these local stores for other than groceries. When you buy a car, though, you know by the name plate on the car what country you are supporting. Nobody but Ford owns Ford ('Buy' the way, my '96 Ford Taurus has 214,000 miles on it. I drive it every day). Nobody but General Motors owns G.M. True, a lot of parts may be made in a foreign country, but when you buy the American car, the American share-holders get the lion's share of your purchase. You buy a Toyota, their shareholders are in Japan. You support the Japanese, not America.

Buy American. That should be your goal and our purpose. Let's have a 'buying' tea party. Buy American. Look for it. It's there. Put our people TO work...and BACK to work. Let's not worry about the other nations. Let's worry about our next-door neighbor's status instead. Instead of paying our neighbor's bills for him by Obama's "spreading the wealth," let's do our good neighbor the greatest favor of all and help him get his job back by buying American. Then he can pay his own bills and have great pride.

If we survive this crisis, other nations will survive, too. They already are buying their own products, their own cars. We have been the only nation who has been duped into buying "foreign," and losing thousands of jobs. Is there a chance, any possibility, that this could have been a conspiracy? What, did you graduate from the University of "Duh"?!

It's funny...sort of...other countries depend on us for all kinds of handouts. Your tax dollars have been "bailing" out countries (even terrorist countries) - for years - in the multi-trillions. It is time to return our own favor and rebuild ourselves. Remember some of you have said that we should feed our own poor instead of feeding "their" poor? Well, now's your chance. Buy American and put our 'new' poor, our let-go auto factory workers, back to work. Regardless of what you think you heard from Obama, the government is not going to buy you a Ford, or Chevy, or Chrysler. He's not even going to buy you a Toyota or a Honda. You are.

Many immigrants get things free from our government through our hard-earned tax dollars...like free education at our best colleges, social security (given from your hard-earned check). Some even get free homes. We have to buy our own. Go ahead, ask for a free college degree. It's only for them. You need someone to give you a break? You are your own break. Buy American. Don't get sucked into losing our economy. Don't believe that you will cause the greatest depression the world has ever seen if you buy American.

The greatest depression this world has ever seen will absolutely be caused by our great United States losing more and more or its middle-class. Remember your buying power. Your buying power is the greatest influence the world has ever seen. Use your influence. Remember the middle-class saying? "Money talks and bull-____ walks! Politicians will not hear your voice. You are nothing but middle-class dirt to them. Remember when you were told as a toddler to use your "inner voice?" Remember? Your mom and/or dad wanted you to speak more quietly? Not to make so much noise? Well, do you know that as a member of the great middle-class of this great country of ours...yours, your "inner voice" is now your WALLET.

No, personally, each one of you is not rich, but as a whole, you are the most powerful body in the world. Remember, you FUND other countries in the multi-trillions! You have ALWAYS been THEIR "bailout."

It's time. It's time to bail YOURSELVES out. This government is not going to bail you out. Not a chance. This government is mostly responsible for getting you into this mess.

Buy American! Do it now! Or lose the greatest country this world has ever seen. This is... "Radio-Free America" ©

By: Stephen T. Hendel
mathphonics@yahoo.com

Can the "Inert" produce DNA?

2009-07-21T07:53:00.000-07:00

It is said that there are stars millions of light years away. When we look up at the stars, we are not seeing the present...we are seeing the past. Their present light will never reach our eyes in our lifetime.

Doesn't this prove the bible is wrong, that creation can't be just some several thousands of years old? Especially when their light takes MILLIONS of light years to reach us, not just a few thousand? What? You graduated from the university of...Duh!

Could it be that when God said, "let there be light!!" that the Lord put things in their place the way He wanted them? Could it be that the Lord showed us how central he is and how eternal He is by showing us how infinite the universe is, that the universe has no end? We take our eyes off him when we wonder about stars millions of light years away, and yet creationists say that bible science shows us that God created everything only some several thousands of years ago, not millions. How can this be?

Astronomers have found some incredibly large stars, some which are bigger than our entire solar system. There is no star small enough or large enough to be excluded from the universe, because there is no end to the universe. Each star is insignificantly small, no matter how large it is. A large star may as well be small. Largeness doesn't matter.

We are told that every galaxie has a black hole. There is an infinity of galaxies! There is an infinity of black holes. We are told that there is space dust. There is an infinity of space dust. There is an infinity of comets and asteroids.
The "downer" is that God didn't create the universe for us to explore it. We can send unmanned probes into the deepest of space, but we'll never go there. There will never be "hands-on" exploration to any significant degree. (I don't see Mars as significant. It's close, but who will volunteer to leave earth possibly forever and commit their lifetime to go there? Remember, "Star Trek" was unfortunately fiction. I, personally, would LOVE to be aboard the Enterprise. See, I even capitalized the Enterprise, I would love to be on it so much!

Then there is us! (The Earth). Sorry, not one scientist has come up with a planet like ours. It is hard for me to fathom that only we exist as the kind of being that we are, or the kind of planet we are. It is hard to fathom that there is absolutely no life in the universe but here. Yet, the universe is basically made up of the same thing: the elements. The elements comprise the universe. There may be elements "out there" we haven't discovered yet. That's because they are "out there."

At this point, we can't even bring back a Mars rock. Like the moon, "soon" we will.

To get at the question of life...sorry folks, there is absolutely no proof that the elements, in any combination, in any form, can produce life. Scientists can't "Frankenstein" it! It is a fact that life is here on this planet! How did life only get here? Again, there is absolutely no proof that there is life "out there." So, "out there" is disqualified. We are stuck with here.

Ready for the answer? I am ready for jeers, spitting, being fired...ah! You can't fire me. I'm not employed by you. Life never came from the elements alone. There is no DNA in matter (the elements). They are inert. Whether you like it or not, life (any DNA), is created by God: not by the elements. He used the elements. He is the only One who does the "Frankenstein" thing. Notice what I said...only God creates DNA. He created ALL life...not just us. Remember, Adam was sent out to name the animals. They have DNA! Adam wasn't told to go out and name

Science is a practicing atheist and will fire people if those people espouse what I just said. Yet, atheistic science and scientists can't do anything about the universe. They pompously speculate that they know all. I say "pompously speculate" because it takes a God-like ego and arrogance to act like they are above mere "creationist mortals" and fire them. You know, the height of human "God"-ery. They take food off of the table from children...the children of other scientists who have kids. Ben Stein did a great documentary on what I call "mad scientists." You know, those who take food away from kids and destroy lives.

Atheistic scientists think they are like the big stars out there. They still don't get it that no matter how big they are, in reality, they are as small to the universe as any other small star. Bigness doesn't matter. We are all "out there."

An atheist can't prove me wrong. There is no way to collect proof.

Now, back to Earth. When an astronautical engineer arrives on some planet or moon or asteroid that has a form of water, or water can be made, that engineer will try to "cross-contaminate" the water supply in order to "prove" life exists at least somewhere else (sort of like Al Gore inventing the internet, or managing to plagiarise a Hollywood movie scene of an iceberg into his "documentary" on global warming). The real "plagiarism" will be when the astronaut cross-contaminates the water supply with life from Earth. Then Obama can say to the world that "He" has discovered life on other planets (you know, "He'll" go from a "specific" to a "general."

How can an atheist scientist want to know where or how the universe began when he doesn't care to know who put it there in the first place? That's like not wanting to know your parents...that's pretty cold! (Now there's some ice)! And that is like an oxymoron, because the big bang was hot...ice...get it?...do I have to tell you everything?

The big bang could have come from ice. "Global" warming of the universe finally makes the big ice "cube" not just melt...but EXPLODE! Fire and water produces steam. A universe full of ice crystals and steam. Oxygen and hydrogen get split up and bind chemically to produce helium and other "resources" (work with me here) and you have gaseous planets (ask my kids about gaseous planets!) forming full of oxygen, hydrogen, helium...cloud planets, mostly steam. But water is still inert. You know, oxygen and hydrogen? Inert?

This is plausible. Remember, atheistic scientists believe that there was a big bang. That means all the elements were "born" from fire? Fire has to have at least heat and oxygen to "light." Then it has to have something combustible. But, hold it...where did the oxygen come from. Before the big bang, how long was the oxygen "hanging" around? And what?...one fine day, the oxygen sucked in upon itself, heat was produced and it exploded?

So...how do you get carbon from oxygen? I ask this question because science believes that inert elements created DNA. How did DNA evolve out of inerts? They don't care, they just believe it.

DNA is amino. But, no inert can "produce," under any circumstances [heat, pressure, cold, light, dark, any combination or mixture of inert elements, chance, time, vibration (they think maybe you can shake life into something?), NO vibration, the choices could go on]...no inert thing can produce a living thing. Therefore, there has to be a leap of intelligence (or should I say, an input from someone's intelligence), to create life with what's there. But nothing inert can produce life. (Please remember, the Genesis Experiment on the Star Trec movie was fiction).

All other life was created before man. We were the last of the DNA to be formed. Why?

We...man...is the point of all creation. You are the point of all creation. So, in a way, everything does revolve around us. That's what God says in the bible. But then, ALL creation revolves around God. That is also what God says in the bible.

For centuries, man has evolved their thinking about centricity. At one time, man thought that the sun and all creation revolved around the earth. Man was wrong. Their science was wrong. To the point, our galaxie revolves around a black hole, and our solar system revolves around the galaxie, and our planet revolves around the sun.

Before the last century, man revolved around God. Now, all intelligence revolves around a few scientists, a few actors (Shirley McClain, John Travolta, Tom Cruse, even John Denver), the founders of "EST," Vernon Wayne Howell (David Koresh), and a good host of others. Man has become his own "right wing" (being that most authors describing terrorism and those who are invoved in "deitistic" thinking consider this mentality "right wing"). Man now revolves around man, not God...or so they think. Wouldn't Shirley McClain love it if she found out she is considered right wing because she thinks she is a God! She would left-hook herself!

Man...revolves...around...man! Scary thought. This is a new form of slavery. It is slavery because those who think they are gods sociopathically keep others down. These gods believe they have "evolved" past everyone else because of their "amazing" life experiences, and how the public idolizes them. These people actually begin to believe that their opinions are, in fact, the truth! Just ask, oh, let's say, Tom Cruse. Yeah, Tom Cruse. He'll tell you that he is far more superior to any psychotherapist with years of study, training and experience. Just watch any tape of an interview with him, and let him "enlighten" you and fascinate you with, not arrogance and ego...no! He'll "enlighten" you with his god-intelligence and simple corrections of what we mere mortals think of as a healing profession. After listening to Him (Cruse), you would never think of getting help.

So now, man revolves around man. I guess this is the final step of evolution, the completion of the last step of the task of DNA. Now if we can only get off this rock and "DNA" our way around this stupid universe. Hey Shirley, Tom, John, all you guys, we're r/evolving! Hello?!

2009-07-08T11:47:00.000-07:00

"545 PEOPLE"
By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems...and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered? If both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we HAVE deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on "appropriations." The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

100...senators,
435...congressmen,
1...President,
and 9...Supreme Court Justices,

equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason... they have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a Senator, a House Member, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing.

I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

It is against Federal law for a citizen of the U. S. to accept, as a business man, a bribe, or to give a bribe, in the normal course of doing business abroad. So, why do we have lobbyists? Bribing our politicians! Out in the open!

No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault.

They cooperate in this common "con" regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits...
The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.

Who is the Speaker of the House? Why, Nancy Pelosi! She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want.

If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million...cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility and taking bribes.

I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they WANT it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they WANT it in the red.

If the Armed Services are in IRAQ, it's because they WANT them in IRAQ.

If they do not receive Social Security, but are on an elite retirement plan not available to "We, the people," it's because they WANT it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied "mystical forces" like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they ALONE, are responsible.

They, and they ALONE, have the power.

They, and they ALONE, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses, provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

This might be funny if it weren't so darned true. Please read on.

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for peanuts
Anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid.

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply...

The inheritance tax
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax (FICA)
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax

(take a breath! you paid for it)

Inventory Tax
IRS Interest on IRS Penalties
(tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge T ax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Sales Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service
FeeTax
Telephone Federal, State and Local
Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage
Surcharge
Telephone Recurring and Non-
recurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What...happened?

Can you spell 'politicians?'

And I still have to 'press 1' for English?!

Overturn Roe V. Wade, A Beginning

2009-06-27T13:40:00.001-07:00

It is like there is a vendetta against Parents, and the Bill of Rights, especially the 1st Amendment: the Freedom of Religion. The Rights in the Bill of Rights were not written and expressed to use them against each other. Each Right is Sovereign and unalienable. One Right does not overcome the other, or annihilate the other. Each Right stands on its own, as if a Person, not to be argued with or trifled with. Our Bill of Rights is a testament of the sturdiness of the Sovereignty of each right. Each Right and Person is only weakened and mocked when one Right is pitted against the other.

The "right to privacy" is not a Right, but an assumption, and made from what was thought to be the totality of the Spirit of our Bill (the Bill of Rights). The fallacy of the "privacy," however, was used as a wedge against Parents in the raising of their children. The Bill of Rights (not one of them!) cannot be used as a convenient "stick" to wedge away a minor child from the Parent/Parents/Guardians. A minor child has only the Rights of the Parents, as the Parents must have (Rights) in terms of Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness, as well as school, health, shelter and any beliefs, codes and mores. You cannot strip Parent/Parents/Guardians of their Rights over their child/ren as a convenient way to prosecute an abortion. The stupidity of this is much characterized through the absolute legal guardianship of a parent HAVING to sign for a ridiculous ear piercing... versus having absolutely NO say when it comes to the incredible physical and psychological complexities of an abortion. An abortion is hard enough on an adult, but a child!? Leaving the Parent(s) out of this metric is child abuse. It is as if the government is saying that the only level of intelligence a Parent can conjure up is just the "simpleton" intelligence one must have to "okay"...an ear piercing. But a parent can't "handle"... an abortion?! Kids are not adoptive by the state through an arbitrary rule, and only "placed" in families by the state to "raise" them (on state terms).

There are families who have Religious beliefs. The ruling on the right to privacy rules against the Parents to have, as Sovereign in their lives, their Freedom of Religion, and the (clear) Expression thereof. We have already stated in the above material that one Right cannot be used against another in order to gain an advantage over the other. You cannot strip Sovereign Rights from the People and consider their Sovereignty nothing more than mediocrity, ignorance, and a toy for legislators and Justices to play with and rule against.

There is no precedence for stripping Rights away from individuals and call it, "...for the common good." This is no more than a human form of "eminent domain," taking the child from the parent and giving "it" to the state, yet without a trial of incompetency! There is no "common" in Sovereignty. We are all subject to laws, but our great and Sovereign Bill of Rights protects us from unjust laws and Remedies. Even criminals are treated with the respect of "Due Process" because of our Bill of Rights. Criminals get a trial. The Justices have wrongly and grossly assumed that Parents are "guilty" and not of the ability to tend to their minor child. There was absolutely no presumption of innocence for Parents as even criminals do get. Our Bill of Rights steps in the way of this presumption.

The only remedy congress and the Justices had against Parents was to invent a new "right;" ignore the Sovereign First Amendment and the Sovereignty of the Parent the Amendment protects, and override the Parents' authority over their own child, and take the child away; meaning, make the child a ward of the State in matters of abortion (only). They think Parents cannot possibly handle abortion! "Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!" The Parents total 1st Amendment Rights are defeated (bullied away!), and their Religion is deemed as inferior to the state, and therefore ignorant in any approach "it" has to the minor child as compared to the "superiority" of the state. There IS NO precedent for this! The state considers that it has given the minor child equal rights against the Parents, hiding the fact of the child being a minor, who only has Rights under the Parents, completely disregarding the natural Sovereign Rights of the Person under the Bill of Rights. The only Persons we have here are the individual Rights of the Bill of Rights...and the Parents. The minor child is not a person by this definition and therefore only falls under the Sovereign Parent...NOT the state.

Note that when a minor child finally turns 18, that Child is only then considered "legal" (excepting the legal Remedy of being emancipated from the Parents at a minor age). Emancipation of a minor child is a legal ruling ONLY... after a legal HEARING of the specific case. Giving a minor child the "right to privacy" with no individual hearing by any court on the competency of the parents (Emancipation), but a blanket ruling of the U.S. Justices, is a violation of the Parents' Sovereignty, and of the Constitution's "Due Process" clause, and the Sovereignty of the Bill of Rights of the Parents. If there is no individual hearing, there can be no ruling. The Supreme Court can't just take a minor child from the parents because it wants to.

Our (Parents') Rights are completely ignored and we are erroneously considered inferior and incompetent. The only reason for the U.S. Justices' ruling is superiority of the state (Statism) over each individual Parent, except for ear piercings and ANY other operation. The "right to privacy" IS abortion (per se), and IS absolutely the only reason for the Justices' ruling. Parents are singled out as absolutely and incontestably inferior by the state to make ANY decision about abortion concerning their minor child. There is absolutely NO precedent for such an arbitrary ruling. The ruling of the "right to privacy" remedy for a minor child is, therefore, ficticious. The ruling is specious at best, and the arguments, by definition, specious. You cannot "just" rule en masse against parents. We parents, as a whole, have not been found incompetent by ANY court. We have definitively not been individually found incompetent, therefore the state cannot take away our child and deny our Constitutional Rights. Our minor children are not equal to us. They are not our peers. As minors, they are our children.

Neither are opinions that the Sovereignty of the Bill of Rights is inferior to public opinion. Neither is any "group" superior to Parents and the Bill of Rights. You cannot undermine the authority of Parents by superceding the Bill of Rights with a "superior" ruling caused by the willful antagonism of any group. There is no superior ruling to the Bill of Rights, foreign or domestic. The basic unit of our country is the Family. The Family is Sovereign by the sheer existence of the Bill of Rights. No court can remove a Family's Sovereignty without Due Process and proving individual justification for doing so, as a crime or a hearing; finding any one individual Family unfit to raise their child. You cannot extinguish Family Rights, or "append" a Family's Sovereignty, by taking away Sovereign Rights.

Courts should never accept cases which compromise the Sovereign Constitutional Rights of the Parents unless a crime has been committed by the individual Parents, and there is justification to amend toward a proper behavior by that court, a Parent to a minor child.

Parents, normally, have committed no crime when a minor child has become pregnant out of wedlock. Therefore, there can be no abridging of Parental rights in favor of the minor child. The Parent is not under a disability just because the minor child is pregnant. No court, therefore, has the right to remove Constitutional Sovereign Rights of Parent(s) over their minor child. No civilian group, nor governmental group, has the right to bring suit against Parents (singly or as a whole) to estop their Sovereign Parental Rights over their minor child without a crime being first committed, or an individual hearing, determining that the Parents are not mature enough, or haven't the wisdom enough, to effect their Parental authority over their minor child.

If there be such a thing as the "right to privacy," it shall exist first...to the Sovereign Parents and for the Parents remedy and benefit against ANY inferior "social" platform agenda of any civilian or governmental group, again, absent any special individual hearing of any one Family to determine a disability, if one might exist, or if a Family has committed a crime, remembering always that the presumption of innocence before guilt is precedent before a remedy is rendered as judgment.

If there is no individual hearing or crime, no court can arbitrarily remove a Parent's charge from their minor child. No hearing, no crime, therefore no conviction, sentence, nor negative finding, and NO Parental disability.

Let the "right to privacy" of any minor child against their Parents be overturned, and the Sovereign Constitutional Bill of Rights of the Parents be restored as permanent Superior Entity, Parent over minor child, in full, without any abridgement or abrogation by any court, other "person," or group, whatever.

Proposed To Strengthen Our Constitution

2009-06-20T11:57:00.000-07:00

Proposed for Amendment to: The Constitution of the United States of America

The Constitution of the United States of America shall be held as a Sovereign Document, of its Sovereign Country, at once unto itself as a Person, and to the several States it protects.

No Part of the Constitution shall be construed as inferior or superior to another Part of our same Constitution.

Each Amendment, and each Part of each Amendment, shall be respected as a Sovereign Right and Person, not to be weakened or made superior by argument from or against another Amendment, or Part of the same Amendment, or Part of another Amendment.

Each Amendment is Sovereign unto itself, as is the Constitution as a whole, and each Part of an any Amendment is Sovereign and stands on its own, even within its same Amendment.

One Amendment cannot be used against another Amendment, or a part of the same Amendment, or the part of another Amendment to silence it, because each is Sovereign.
The Amendment is as a Person. No Person is silenced because each Amendment, and Part thereof enjoys, in and of itself, the Freedom of Speech and all of the other enumerated Inalienable and Sovereign Rights.

No one Amendment, or Part thereof, of an Amendment can be used to belittle, accuse, vilify, or weaken another Amendment, or construed to be superior in any light to, a Part of an Amendment. No Amendment, nor Part thereof, can be silenced in favor of another. They are Equally Sovereign unto themselves and Stand Alone and to each other, as the Whole of the Constitution of the United States of America is Sovereign and Stands Alone.

Example: The Sovereign Freedom of Speech cannot be used against the Sovereign Freedom of Religion as a Remedy nor as a Disability. No Sovereign Branch of our Government, whether Legislative, Executive, or Judicial shall diminish any Sovereign Amendment, or Part thereof. Any Bill does not estop, hush, detain, diminish, deride, abuse, nor check any Sovereign Part of our Constitution.

The United States Constitution, a Person that is Inalienable, is as from God, and Breathes its Breath into the very fabric of Its total society which It created, unless a crime is committed against our Way of Life, and Due Process ensues, and Rights become suspended by assessed Remedy and/or Disability, or abolished on that person who is subject to our Laws.

The Constitution of the United States cannot be judged, cannot commit a crime, and cannot be so judged that it did, cannot err, and is therefore not subject to any other law, foreign or Domestic.

The Constitution of the United States of America is Itself a Sovereign Person, which grows carefully and righteously in Its search for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness for its Citizens and those who are here legally.

Proposed for Amendment: by Stephen T. Hendel
1425 Lela Ln., Milford, Ohio 45150
(513) 722-3005
mathphonics@yahoo.com

“Radio-Free America” ©

2009-06-13T14:49:00.000-07:00

We have to understand "mentality" concerning Black Liberation Theology. Think about it: We believe that blacks are upset over just the Confederate flag of the South because of the connotations over slavery. There is a much bigger picture here. What we don't realize is that Black Liberation Theology has been preaching that it is the American flag that (some) African-"American" blacks don't like. As at least one example: Rev. Wright (who Obama claims he hardly knows, stated, "America's CHICKENS...have come HOME...to ROOST!" And, "God DAMN America...!"

The American flag reminds blacks that they were NOT originally "invited," nor were they included (again, originally) in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution of the United States of America.

The colonies, however they were organized, were exclusive only to certain whites. Blacks had no rights whatsoever, and "lived" at the pleasure of slave owners. Blacks had no rights, neither BEFORE the original Articles of Confederation, nor UNDER the Articles of Confederation (of the colonies), nor under our Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. If a black man wanted to sue a white man for anything, he could not because he wasn't even considered a human being! Legally, blacks were considered animals until the Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863. That is not a joke, nor a slight! It's true. To whites, at that time, in that culture, blacks were animals.

As late as 1970, I knew a woman, a member of a southern Baptist church, who argued vehemently that blacks were animals; she was taught that they had no soul and could not go to heaven. That church (the Synod of that church) has since apologized for their teachings.

So, here we are in our own safe little "world" called the United States of America, in the year 2009, not realizing that there are actual CITIZENS of the United States who want it to come "down." You have heard that Barach Obama was a community organizer? A community planner? And, as he was interviewed by many a news show, and commentator, and in the speeches he gave, he kept saying he had... "people?" He "had" the likes of James van Jones, an avowed Marxist communist; and "had" Bill Ayers, who was more than just a radical thinker...he used explosives to blow up a police station and other places. But he also has financiers like George Soros, an absolute global Socialist, and he and others are looking for a "return" on their "investment" in their President Obama.

Back to Black Liberation Theology...So, while "we" are all worried about the Confederate flag, and the continued "fallout" from that, it has been the American flag all along that blacks don't like. Blacks have always associated the American flag with slavery. True, blacks fought in our Revolutionary War, and all subsequent wars. Yet, they have never felt accepted, and, to them, they aren't accepted. Yet, unbeknownst to most blacks, most whites have accepted blacks...for years...as equals, in spite of some stupid churches and people.

Now, at the same time, we see Abraham Lincoln as the one who "freed" the slaves. You MUST understand that being "free" is evolutionary in itself - the concept of being "free" was even NEW at that time, even to most whites. Just look at the oppression against the colonists by the King. Back to my point. Black Liberation Theology sees Lincoln as the President who said, and I paraphrase, "Union first." "Union first" meant...rather than pushing for the abolition of slavery right away, which would cause the South and some Northern states to secede from the Union immediately, Lincoln decided to delay the abolition of slavery, keep the North together as a Union, and deal with the South as he could. He would tackle slavery later because he had to preserve the Union. Like it or not, as President, that was his first job, his first priority. Blacks and Liberation Theology have never forgiven that "slight" from President Lincoln. But they only knew about that later.

Blacks also have never forgiven that blacks, in that time, were slaves. Every generation of blacks teaches this history to the next generation of blacks. We, as "whites," and the rest of the nation, do not know this.

We see Lincoln as a liberator; blacks see him as the one who kept slavery going with "union first," even for the short while before their Emancipation. To blacks, Lincoln ended slavery so that Great Britain would not join the South against us in the Civil War. It was an expedient move, a political move, a move of strategy, and a move of aggrandizement of the Yankee North to England. It was not seen as a move of care, of love, or of conscience for the overall benefit of blacks.

The truth is, if Great Britain had joined the South against the North, the South would have been shocked (albeit too late) to realize that Great Britain would have eventually taken over "their" old colonies again. Neither the North nor the South would have been strong enough at that time, during our own Civil War, to fight off the British again. The Boston "Tea Party," the original Revolutionary War, and the War of 1812 would have been for nothing. We would again, today, be back under British rule. The British might have also retaken the Caribbean islands and continued their "olde profitable" slave trade. The British had eradicated slavery back home, but, unlike the United States, Britain was an imperialist nation and would NOT have ended slavery here.

Christianity among blacks is NOT the same as Christianity among whites. I personally had quite an experience of that. At a Pentecostal-type church I once attended, I held a cell-group at my house. We would discuss the previous Sunday's sermon. Blacks, who were supposed to come to my cell, and other blacks who were supposed to go to other cells, started their OWN cell. They snubbed us. When asked, they admitted it. Black Christians teach themselves a different thing. Whites are not invited. And they say WE are the racists?

We, as whites, do not know that blacks hold a grudge against Lincoln for his "Union first." Obama is President now. He is the first generation, cultural "product" of Black Liberation Theology “upbringing” to be President. He is a hardcore Democratic Socialist. The Black Liberation Theology culture is as ingrained in millions of blacks as the Roman Catholic culture is ingrained in Roman Catholics. He now considers himself black. He now evidently also considers himself Muslim. Blacks, who at first said he wasn't "black enough"...now embrace him. They, now, can't get enough of him. Barach Obama is now doing what those who espouse Black Liberation Theology wanted to do; he is slowly taking over the government, replacing our government.

He is slowly changing the operating system of our government from a Democratic Republic and one of a free-enterprise Capitalism, to a Socialist government and one of a reapportionment of our capital and tax monies. Right under our noses. He is robbing from the poor (you and me), to give to the rich (corporations!...bailouts...hello?)! This is a takeover...a very unique "eminent domain" of our tax money.

He commandeers (takes) by "eminent domain," taxes you and I paid, and he gives them, without oversight, or promise of payback...or profit, to failed businesses. He knows "we" will never get it back. That's the point. We slowly become a third-world nation like his "newly-found" African brothers. We lose our power and leverage in the world...on purpose (to his purpose).

As Obama said in his speech to the Muslim nations, " ... that no one nation can think of itself as being above other nations." Obama does not want the United States to be a super power any longer; but we are to be just like other nations, so now...we can no longer a “threat” to the world (we were a threat?).

Islam rules by the economic power and authority of their oil base. So, the playing field is NOT being leveled after all! Obama wants Islam to take control of the world. Notice that Obama is against ALL domestic oil drilling anywhere. He is only for the "elusive" green alternatives, which he hasn't and won't start. That is why they are elusive. Meanwhile, Islam becomes richer by plan. Gee, so does China...and North Korea...and Iran...and Japan.

You have to remember that blacks don't CARE what replaces our government: they just want it replaced. Blacks don't care about a plan. Any plan will do.

With Obama in charge, blacks will blindly trust him. What we "whites" further don't know is etymology; the originations of black thought. There is James Cone, a black man who wrote extensively about Black Liberation Theology in the ‘60’s, who said that the black intellectual's goal is to "...aid in the destruction of America as he knows it." This was in the magazine, "National Review."
Understand that Barach Obama was raised in the "dogmas" and "tenets" of Black Liberation Theology. Remember Reverend Wright? Twenty years a member?

According to him (James Cone), such a destruction of America requires both black anger ("God damn America!"), and white guilt (continual social programs we can't sustain). He claimed the black-power theologian's GOAL is to tell the story of American oppression so powerfully and precisely ("precisely" includes lying, and teaching that Jesus was black), that white men will "...tremble, curse, and go mad, because they will be drenched with the filth of their evil."

Black Liberation Theology has another tenet, "Collective Salvation," which basically states that we whites have taken everything from the black man and now they want it back! The truth is, there is no paying "it" back because Black Liberation Theology and collective salvation have no forgiveness. Their ideology is based on the Nation of Islam, a black separatist ideology which offers absolutely no forgiveness. Please notice that "Rev." Wright IS a black separatist. Obama sat under this mentality and brainwashing for 20 years.

Well, we are not trembling, cursing, or going mad (because we, now, have never known, nor had slaves), but yet “we” (our government) are already being replaced. Our new constitution is already being written. It is about to be installed. The ribbon ceremony is near. Instead of our Founding Fathers, we now have our destructing fathers, like van Jones, and Bill Ayers.

We have to also realize why Obama isn't going after the Second Amendment (gun laws). After our Constitution is replaced, we won't have a Second Amendment to worry about.

We will be without our own Sovereignty, but we will be under international law and the United Nations. They WILL take your guns away. They don't CARE if you go to jail.

In their thinking, we'll be getting a taste of our own medicine. We may not be slaves, but...being white, and Christian, we are already "profiled." This country, the United States of America, is being profiled, as white-imperialistic-capitalistic-free enterprise.

Homeland Security already issued a memo concerning, 1. military personnel coming home from the war, 2. Christians, and 3. pro-lifers, as being part of a possible right-wing conspiracy and that WE need to be watched. Then, Janet Napolitano stated, "Just kidding." Are you scared yet? You should be. And you're not on "Scare Tactics." You live in the United States of America, one step away from Sharia Law (Obama's next step), and European PROGRESSIVISM.

Take your last pictures of living in the “United States” as you know it. Why do you think something as conservative as "Jessica's Law" has not been enacted in the most very liberal states? Europe doesn't do anything about child exploitation (molestation) either. Child exploitation is a big market in Europe, and part of their thriving economy.

Obama also stated recently in his speech that we are NOT a Christian nation, but we ARE a Muslim nation. He bragged about his Muslim roots. Obama wasn't referring to The Nation of Islam, which is the closest ideology and cultural tie to Islam in this country, but he is referring to Black Liberation Theology, taught by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago, his home church for at least 20 years, and is also taught at a host of other black churches.

Black Liberation Theology is a whole different "American" culture. It disdains and abhors traditional (biblical) white American culture and Christianity for how "white" it is. Remember that Black Liberation Theology teaches: that Jesus is black, and that institutional racism is as prevalent...as it ever was. And especially, that the blood of Christ cannot save you. You can accept Jesus as your personal savior all you want...you are not saved.

Black Liberation Theology condemns traditional American culture for its institutional racism. In condemning traditional American Christian culture, Black Liberation Theology has sought a replacement for..."us."

Their Hope has been serendipitously found in Barach Hussein Obama (actually, he was well-planned and trained), the embodiment of a new-age Christian, a neo-Muslim, a practicing Socialist, the consistently quintessential "yes-man" and shill of countless special-interest groups (actually, they are SELF-interest groups, narcissists, if you will) and he is THE "High Priest" of Black Liberation Theology, and its collective salvation.

In short, Obama is a new "evolution" of black liberation: the new, black, metro-man (cape and other accessories sold separately)! And he will be the leader of this hemisphere, "Pan America."

Written by: Stephen T. Hendel
radio-freeamerica.blogspot.com